Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 24.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychology. 2018 Nov 26;33(2):203–211. doi: 10.1037/neu0000502

Table 2.

Mean Raw Scores (SD) and Effect Sizes of Olfactory and Neuropsychological Measures

Neuropsychological
Domain
Test Test Index Used Psychosis
(n = 63)
Controls
(n = 63)
Effect
Size
Olfactory Functioning SS-ODT Odor discrimination accuracy 9.69 (2.41)b 10.83 (2.41)b −0.48
SS-OIT Odor identification accuracy 11.06 (2.23)b 12.15 (2.23)b −0.49
Processing Speed GPB Mean completion time over two trials
bilaterally
88.24 (16.65)a 68.59 (16.65)a −1.18
PCT Sum of letter completions 28.89 (8.47) 33.70 (8.47) −0.57
Sum of pattern completions 38.48(8.47) 44.72 (8.47) −0.74
Attention and Working Memory DS Sum of longest forward and backward span 10.46 (2.30) 11.78 (2.30) −0.57
BTA Sum of total letters and numbers correct 13.25 (3.70) 16.41 (3.71) −0.85
Auditory-verbal Learning/Memory HVLT Total words learned (HVLT Learning) 22.24 (4.96) 26.28 (4.96) −0.81
Delayed word recall (HVLT delay) 7.17 (2.43) 9.38 (2.43) −0.91
Visuospatial Learning/Memory BVMT Total figures learned (BVMT Learning) 23.43 (6.19) 28.04 (6.19) −0.75
Delayed figure recall (BVMT delay) 8.98 (2.17) 10.61 (2.17) −0.75
Ideational Fluency CIFA-VF Letter-guided verbal fluency 25.92 (8.86) 32.89 (8.86) −0.79
Category-guided verbal fluency 40.17 (11.23) 48.89 (11.23) −0.78
CIFA-DF Novel designs produced 12.36 (6.62) 17.85 (6.62) −0.83
Executive Functioning MWCST Number of category sorts 5.00 (1.16) 5.70 (1.16) −0.60
Number of perseverative errors 4.89 (4.44)a 2.46 (4.44)a −0.55

Note. Sniffin’ Sticks Odor Identification and Discrimination Identification Test (SS-OIT and SS-ODT; Hummel et al., 1997; Kobal et al., 1996), Grooved Pegboard Test (GPB; Klove, 1963), Salthouse Perceptual Comparison Test (PCT; Salthouse, 1996), Digit Span Forward and Backward (DS; Wechsler, 1956), Brief Test of Attention (BTA; Schretlen, 1989), Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised (HVLT; Brandt, 2001), Brief Visuospatial Memory Test – Revised (BVMT; Benedict, 1997), Verbal Fluency (VF) and Design Fluency (DF) subtests of the Calibrated Ideational Fluency Assessment (CIFA; Schretlen & Vannorsdall, 2010), Modified Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (MWCST; Nelson, 1976)

Mean raw scores and standard deviations presented are the estimated marginal means after adjusting for age, sex, and education

Cohen’s d

a

Larger scores denote poorer performances

b

Olfactory scores were adjusted for the amount of cigarettes per day in addition to age, sex, and education.