Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Cancer Causes Control. 2022 Aug 18;33(11):1325–1333. doi: 10.1007/s10552-022-01618-2

Table 1.

Study characteristics for peer-reviewed papers on increasing cervical cancer screening

First author (Year) Location Final sample size Participant characteristics Intervention description Types of components
Effect sizes for Pap test
Education Patient navigation Phone call Counseling Systems Other
Blumenthal (2005) Tennessee and Georgia, USA 3914 Age 18+, African American living in predominantly black census tracts of 4 study cities Educational sessions, mass media campaigning with local partners, and community events X Mass media, CBPR Tenn.: + 2.5%
Georg.: − 3.7%
Braun (2015) Hawaii, USA 488 Age not specified, Asian and Pacific Islander, Medicare beneficiaries Patient navigators assisted with breast, cervical, colorectal, and prostate screening X X X + 20.6%
Fernandez (2009) New Mexico, Texas, and California, USA 243 Age 50+, Hispanic, low-income, farmworker, no cancer history, not up-to-date for cervical or breast cancer screening LHW presented in-home educational session, provided local screening information, and followed-up after 2 weeks X Community health worker + 15.9%
Maxwell (2003) California, USA 530 Age 40+, Filipino women Female Filipino health educator led a group educational session and provided information on local facilities and free testing X + 4.0%
Paskett (1999) North Carolina, USA 302 Age 40+, predominantly African American, living in low-income housing communities in the 2 study cities Educational programs with LHWs (group and individual), targeted mailings, mass media campaigns, and in clinic services (posters, literature, counseling, follow-up) X X X + 21.0%
Studts (2012) Kentucky, USA 345 Age 40–64, living in rural Appalachian counties in Kentucky, overdue for cervical cancer screening Educational lunch, home visits with lay health advisor, and newsletters addressing barriers to treatment X X + 7.0%
Taylor (2002) Washington, USA and British Columbia, Canada 482 Age 20–69, Chinese, living in 2 study cities, under-utilizers of Pap testing, spoke Cantonese, Mandarin or English, no history of cervical cancer, no hysterectomy Intervention 1: outreach worker provided tailored counseling and assistance with logistics of screening
Intervention 2: direct mail of educational resources
X X Home visits, transportation + 10.0%
+ 24.0%
Taylor (2010) Washington, USA 234 Age 20–79, Vietnamese, speak Vietnamese or English, living in Seattle during study, has a uterus, not up-to-date for Pap test Vietnamese-American community health workers made home visits, provided education with video and print resources, and addressed cultural barriers to screening X X Community health worker home visit + 10.0%
Thompson (2016) Washington, USA 443 Age 21–64, Latina, living in the Yakima Valley, seen by one of the FQHCs in the past 5 years, not up-to-date for Pap test, no prior hysterectomy Intervention 1: low-intensity intervention, educational video sent to participants’ homes
Intervention 2: high-intensity intervention, video plus in-home promo-tora education session
X X + 4.7%
+ 19.4%