Skip to main content
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open logoLink to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open
. 2023 Apr 26;11(4 Suppl):57-58. doi: 10.1097/01.GOX.0000934584.52066.46

PC56. Evaluating Facelift Complications and the Effectiveness of the Smasectomy Technique: A Single Center’S 15-year Experience

Orr Shauly 1, Gregory L Stone 2, Rebecca Shin 3, Troy Marxen 1, W Grant Stevens 3, Daniel J Gould 2
PMCID: PMC10125421

PURPOSE: To assess the benefits and risks of the SMASectomy technique.

METHODS: The records of all patients who underwent a facelift procedure between December 2004 and March 2019, were reviewed for this study. All procedures were performed at an AAAASF-accredited outpatient facility in Marina Del Rey, California. This represents data on 241 total patients. Retrospective chart review was performed to include data on patient characteristics, operative technique, and complications.

RESULTS: Average operative time of 152.68 ± 51.50 minutes and anesthesia time of 175.00 ± 54.07 minutes was observed amongst those patients that underwent SMASectomy. This was significantly lower (p < 0.000001) than those that did not undergo SMASectomy (average operative time of 265.25 ± 85.25 minutes and anesthesia time of 294.22 ± 85.31 minutes). There were no observed facial nerve injuries among patients that underwent SMASectomy. No DVT events were observed in this patient population.

CONCLUSION: In the hands of an experienced surgeon, the SMASectomy facelift technique offers the unique advantage of significantly reducing operating time and anesthesia time and can provide extremely favorable and long-lasting aesthetic results.


Articles from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open are provided here courtesy of Wolters Kluwer Health

RESOURCES