Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 13;3(1):vbad051. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbad051

Table 1.

Benchmark Pearson correlation coefficient of ACDA/CDA models on select tissues and studies

Dataset Tissue Train Test ACDA CDA EN EN-ACDA ACDA-EN-ACDA
GDSC1&2 Breast 127 64 0.439 ± 0.080 0.377 ± 0.066 0.394 ± 0.101 0.492 ± 0.083 0.520 ± 0.083
GDSC1 Breast 79 40 0.596 ± 0.032 0.529 ± 0.033 0.700 ± 0.063 0.733 ± 0.032 0.717 ± 0.200
GDSC2 Breast 108 55 0.706 ± 0.054 0.449 ± 0.038 −0.079 ± 0.021 0.594 ± 0.106 0.675 ± 0.064
GDSC1&2 Bladder 73 37 0.501 ± 0.013 0.481 ± 0.037 0.597 ± 0.039 0.656 ± 0.025 0.613 ± 0.015
GDSC1 Bladder 60 30 0.602 ± 0.042 0.634 ± 0.037 0.628 ± 0.040 0.658 ± 0.040 0.647 ± 0.041
GDSC2 Bladder 58 29 0.098 ± 0.083 0.183 ± 0.061 0.454 ± 0.072 0.436 ± 0.061 0.318 ± 0.058
DC-AZ Breast 6585 3293 0.908 ± 0.006 0.540 ± 0.015a 0.278 ± 0.019 0.916 ± 0.005 0.916 ± 0.005
DC-AZ Lung 2340 1170 0.526 ± 0.017 0.371 ± 0.011a 0.382 ± 0.031 0.589 ± 0.018 0.603 ± 0.016
DC-AZ Urinary tract 2921 1461 0.744 ± 0.021 0.497 ± 0.014a 0.331 ± 0.025 0.798 ± 0.017 0.788 ± 0.018
a

Linear regression was used instead of logistic regression.