Skip to main content
. 2022 Oct 14;27(2):281–291. doi: 10.1007/s10029-022-02692-w

Table 1.

Patient- and hernia characteristics

Total group (n = 52)
Age (years), median (IQR) 56 (46.3;65.8)
Male sex, no (%) 28 (53.8%)
BMI (kg/m2), median (IQR) 29.2 (25.7;32.3)
BMI > 30 (kg/m2), no (%) 21 (40.3%)
Location of hernia, no (%)

 Midline

 Lateral

45 (86.5%

7 (13.5%)

Complicating hernia characteristics (ǂ), no (%)

 0

 1–2

  ≥ 3

7 (13.5%)

30 (57.7%)

15 (28.8%)

Modified VHWG classification, grade, no (%)

 1

 2

 3

5 (9.6%)

23 (44.2%)

24 (46.2%)

Hernia complexity according to Slater classification, no (%)

 Minor complex

 Moderate complex

 Major complex

2 (3.8%)

23 (44.2%)

27 (52%)

Hernia width (cm), median (IQR) 14 (8.9;18.6)
Loss of domain (%), median (IQR) 10 (3.0;19.2)
Stoma present, any kind, no (%) 10 (19.2%)
Intestinal fistula(s) present, no (%) 12 (23.1%)
Infected mesh present, no (%) 9 (17.3%)
Previous abdominal surgery, no (%)

 1–2

 3–4

  ≥ 5

11 (21.1%)

21 (40.4%)

20 (38.5%)

Previous hernia repair, no (%)

 0

 1

  ≥ 2

25 (48.1%)

13 (25%)

14 (26.9%)

(ǂ) Including: presence of a stoma, intestinal fistula, infected mesh, transverse defect width ≥ 10 cm, loss of domain > 20%, and previous hernia repair)

BMI body mass index, VHWG ventral hernia working grade