Table 1.
Sources of evidence | Categories |
---|---|
Ecomaps | - Broad, diverse network |
- Weak and tenuous relationships | |
- No need to expend energy | |
- Little support | |
- Non-stressful relationships | |
Field notes of participant observation | - Lack of information about sectors |
- Lack of connection between services and municipal departments | |
- Fragile relationships with sport, leisure, culture, and structural sectors | |
- Unclear concept of intersectoral collaboration | |
- Local professionals do not participate in intersectoral discussion groups | |
- Initial action is always someone else’s responsibility | |
- Map elaboration provided new information about areas | |
- Difficult enrollment in Projeto Nascente | |
- Family Health Strategy teams irregularly represented in Projeto Nascente | |
- Professionals with promotion potential for intersectoral collaboration | |
- Strategic professionals in the implementation of programs | |
- Double hiring of professionals as a possibility to build bridges | |
Interviews | - Fragile relationships with sport, leisure, culture, and
structural sectors - Participation of sport, leisure, and culture as a permanent promise |
- Local professionals do not participate in intersectoral discussion groups | |
- Relationship difficulties even within institutional intersectoral programs | |
- Planned actions remain sectorial | |
- Initial action is always someone else’s responsibility | |
- Absence of any systematic recommendations for intersectoral collaboration | |
- Difficult enrollment in Projeto Nascente | |
- Health criticized other sectors for not having an expanded view of health and health promotion | |
- Asymmetrical position of health and social work in relation to health and social issues | |
- Professionals with promotion potential for intersectoral collaboration | |
- Strategic professionals in the implementation of programs | |
- Double hiring of professionals as a possibility to build bridges | |
- Formation of intersectoral committees | |
- Matrix support to share knowledge, responsibility, and stimulate relationships | |
- Case managers to coordinate case discussion | |
- University support for innovation |