Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 11;10:1113013. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1113013

Table 5.

Macro environment.

Sub-level Factor Consumer behavior Evidence* (References)
Consumption Purchase What How When Positive association Negative association Significant difference No association/no significant difference
Natural landscape Ecological zone (forest vs. coastal) F x (31)
V x (31)
Ecological zone (Savannah vs. coastal) F x (31)
V x (31) (31)
Forest cover F x (40) (40)
V x (40) (40)
FV x (40)
Forest vs. non-forest area F x (75)
V x (75) (75)
FV x (75)
Season Season F x (40) (43, 72, 76) (36, 40, 72)
F x x (41) (41)
F x (69)
V x (36, 43, 70, 72, 76)
V x (69) (40)
V x x (41) (41)
V X (70)
FV x (43, 70) (36, 40, 70, 72)
FV x x (41) (41)
FV x (70)
Urbanization Strata of urbanization F x (51)
V x (51)
Urbanicity level (various levels compared to least urban) FV x (71)
Rural to urban migration FV x (78) (78)
Societal and cultural norms Religion F x (31) (31, 54)
V x (31) (31) (31, 54)
FV x (45) (54)
FV x (48)
*

Evidence: Relationship for positive or negative association qualified as statistically significant at the 5% level, based on correlation and regression analysis. Significant differences: tested e.g., via t-tests; ANOVA; No association, no significant difference: not statistically significant, or no association. F, Fruit; FV, Fruit and vegetables combined; V, Vegetables; What: Quantities consumed, amount spent for purchasing FV; % of people consuming F, V or FV; How: Represents the frequency of consumption or purchase; Where: is referring to urban/rural areas; in 70 where is referring to where the consumed FV were obtained from, e.g., from the market or from the wild.