Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 25;40(4):msad041. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msad041

Table 1.

Site Models for Testing Positive Selection Affecting Amino Acid Residues in a Protein.

Site model Free parametersa Number of site classes Model parameters Model comparison (LRT)
M1a 2 (p0, ω0) 2 p 0 (p1 = 1 − p0),
ω0 < 1, ω1 = 1
M1a vs. M2a: df = 2
M2a 4 (p0, p1, ω0, ω2) 3 p 0, p1 (p2 = 1 − p0p1),
ω0 < 1, ω1 = 1, ω2 > 1
M7 2 (p, q) 10 beta(p, q) M7 vs. M8: df = 2
M8 4 (p0, p, q, ωs) 11 p 0, (p1 = 1 − p0),
beta(p, q), ωs > 1
a

Number of free parameters in the ω distribution. M1a: p0 is the proportion of sites with ω0 < 1, while p1 =1 − p0 is the proportion of sites with ω1 = 1. M2a: same as M1a but includes an additional class of sites with ω2 > 1 in proportion p2, with p0 + p1 + p2 = 1. M7: the model uses a beta distribution with parameters p and q to describe variable ω for sites in the range 0 ≤ ω ≤ 1. M8: p0 is the proportion of sites with ω from beta(p, q) as in M7, but an additional class is now added (with proportion p1) with ωs > 1.