Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 6;6:3. doi: 10.1186/s40850-021-00069-7

Table 1.

Data of the sampled river sections

No River name Sample site Date Geo-coordinates Elev. (m) Haplotype frequencies Σ
H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 H9
1. Crișul Repede/Sebes-Körös Bratca/Barátka 2016.09.06 46.933, 22.664 354 6 6
2. Crișul Alb/Fehér-Körös Leasa/Sövényes 2016.09.06 46.277, 22.535 209 2 2
3. Bega /Béga/ Făget/Facsád 2018.09.26 45.846, 22.131 139 4 4
4. Timiș/Temes Zăgujeni/ Zaguzsén 2018.09.25 45.478, 22.180 178 3 3 6
5. Bârzava/Berzava Gătaia/ Gáttája 2018.09.27 45.441, 21.454 109 6 6
6. Caraș/ Krassó Grădinari/Kákófalva 2018.09.27 45.109, 21.581 102 4 1 5
7. Nera Néra Bozovici/Bozovics 2018.09.27 44.902, 21.988 235 5 5
8. Strei/ Sztrigy Petreni/Petrény 2018.09.28 45.786, 23.015 208 5 5
9. Târnava Mică/Kis-Küküllő Chibed/Kibéd 2016.09.09 46.539, 24.983 382 5 1 6
10. Olt/Olt Miercurea Ciuc /Csíkszereda 2016.09.09 46.319, 25.828 652 5 1 6
11. Argeș/Argyas Rotunda 2016.09.07 45.268, 24.656 525 5 5
Σ 5 13 11 1 3 13 4 1 5 56

Code, Romanian and Hungarian names of the sampled rivers and sampling sites, collection date, and geo-coordinates, altitude above sea level (Elev.) and haplotype frequencies in each sampling sites. (H1-H9 indicated haplotypes during this study). Site numbers and haplotype codes correspond with Figs. 1, 2 and 3. Previously unknown haplotypes are highlighted with bold letter type