Purpose of review
Aging is an important risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is associated with increased vessel wall stiffness. Pathophysiological stiffening, notably in arteries, disturbs the integrity of the vascular endothelium and promotes permeability and transmigration of immune cells, thereby driving the development of atherosclerosis and related vascular diseases. Effective therapeutic strategies for arterial stiffening are still lacking.
Recent findings
Here, we overview the literature on age-related arterial stiffening, from patient-derived data to preclinical in-vivo and in-vitro findings. First, we overview the common techniques that are used to measure stiffness and discuss the observed stiffness values in atherosclerosis and aging. Next, the endothelial response to stiffening and possibilities to attenuate this response are discussed.
Summary
Future research that will define the endothelial contribution to stiffness-related cardiovascular disease may provide new targets for intervention to restore endothelial function in atherosclerosis and complement the use of currently applied lipid-lowering, antihypertensive, and anti-inflammatory drugs.
Keywords: Aging, atherosclerosis, endothelium, mechanotransduction, stiffness
INTRODUCTION
The risk of developing cardiovascular disease is higher upon older age, with a majority of cardiovascular disease-related deaths occurring at an age of 70 years or older [1,2]. The high prevalence of cardiovascular disease in the elderly emphasizes the urge to understand vascular aging. Currently applied interventions for cardiovascular patients, such as antihypertensive ACE-inhibitors, statins, or anti-inflammatory agents are known to reduce cardiovascular risk significantly. However, these therapies do not suffice to prevent cardiovascular events in all patients and are not free from adverse effects. Targeting of the vascular response to age-related stiffening may serve as promising complementary approach of existing therapeutics, in particular for atherosclerotic lesions in the arterial wall.
The onset of atherosclerosis often occurs asymptomatically and it is difficult to predict the stage of atherosclerotic disease based on current traditional cardiovascular disease risk factors. Hypertension is a key cardiovascular risk factor, which precedes clinically identifiable atherosclerosis. Arteries undergo structural and functional changes upon aging and one of the main alterations is wall stiffening [3,4]. Arterial stiffening also precedes the development of cardiovascular disease and is emerging as an independent risk factor with predictive value for clinical outcome [3–5]. The predictive value of adverse cardiovascular events based on arterial stiffness is similar to other important risk factors such as left ventricular hypertrophy [6–8]. Arterial stiffening is a multifactorial process, which is caused by the increase in the deposition and crosslinking of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins in the vessel wall. This process is accompanied by an increase in vessel wall thickness and artery size. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is the standard macroscopic measurement of arterial stiffness in clinical diagnosis [9–11]. Indeed, PWV measurements in participants of the Framingham offspring cohort confirmed that vascular stiffening precedes the occurrence of hypertension and cardiovascular events [12,13]. This suggests that in patients with similar blood pressure for instance, the monitoring of differences in arterial stiffness helps to better predict the clinical outcome [14,15].
Currently applied therapeutic interventions already significantly reduce cardiovascular risk. Targeting the vascular response to stiffening, if used as combination therapy, could further improve such existing treatments [16]. Research aimed at therapeutic targeting of arterial stiffening has first focused on reversing the physical stiffening and outward remodeling of arteries. This approach turned out difficult due to lack of specificity and potency of drugs and the redundancy of involved signaling pathways [16]. Another approach to improve vascular function is to alleviate the response of the vascular cells (endothelial cells, vascular smooth muscle cells, pericytes, and fibroblasts) to arterial wall stiffening. The endothelium in healthy vessels activates various mechanotransduction pathways that maintain tissue integrity during the rapid and strong changes in mechanical forces that derive from pulsatile blood flow and vessel wall contractions. A healthy endothelial monolayer adapts to these forces while preserving its vascular barrier function. Upon disturbance in forces, however, like at atheroprone bifurcations or in stiff arteries, the endothelium fails to adapt and the arterial wall becomes prone to lipid accumulation and the infiltration of inflammatory cells [17,18]. Upon pathological vascular stiffening the endothelial cells fail to appropriately mechano-respond and become dysfunctional as barrier tissue [19–21]. Endothelial permeability is an essential step in the development and progression of early atherosclerosis [21,22▪▪]. A feedback loop of increased vascular stiffness and endothelial dysfunction promotes atherogenesis and its targeting has the potential to restore overall vascular homeostasis and counteract arterial stiffening.
This review provides an overview of current findings on arterial stiffening, from clinical studies to preclinical in-vivo and in-vitro experiments. We will overview the common techniques that are used to measure arterial stiffness and discuss patterns, and discrepancies, in the observed pathological and age-related arterial stiffening values. Finally, the endothelial responses to arterial stiffening, and current therapeutic strategies to attenuate them, are briefly mentioned. As effective therapeutic strategies for arterial stiffening are still lacking, improved models to better study and understand the endothelial role in arterial stiffness-related cardiovascular diseases will pave the way for new potential therapeutic strategies.
Box 1.
no caption available
PATHOLOGICAL STIFFENING OF THE BLOOD VESSEL WALL
Arterial wall layers and the extracellular matrix
Arteries are composed of three layers, namely the tunica intima, media, and adventitia layer. The intimal and medial layers, and the medial and adventitial layers are separated by the internal and external elastic membranes, respectively. The tunica intima consists of the endothelium, a monolayer of cells that lines the inner surface of the blood vessel, and a thin subendothelial layer of extracellular matrix, called the basement membrane. The basement membrane is composed of ECM proteins, such as laminins and collagen IV [23]. During aging and arterial stiffening, the relatively soft inner elastic membrane degrades and the intima thickens due to the activity of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and the increased deposition of ECM proteins in the basement membrane [24,25].
The tunica media is comprised of multiple layers of VSMCs and ECM. Two important constituents of the ECM in the media are the elastin sheets and collagen fibers. Elastin contributes to the elastic properties of the blood vessel and its resilience to pulsatile pressure; whereas collagen fibers are not elastically deformable and determine the expansibility of the blood vessel [23]. VSMCs in the media are the effectors for blood vessel contraction, controlling vessel diameter, blood flow, and general arterial tone. VSMCs are also able to synthesize ECM proteins, in particular collagen I and III. Most VSMCs show a contractile phenotype, but during arterial stiffening VSMCs switch to a more proliferative and synthetic phenotype and increase their ECM production [26]. This increase in collagen fiber deposition, in combination with increased crosslinking of the ECM, increases the overall thickness and stiffness of the media during ageing. Endothelial cells undergo a similar process called endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition upon stiffening of their microenvironment, and consequently contribute to the stiffening of the intima layer by secreting fibrillar collagens, fibronectin and matrix metalloproteases that degrade laminin and elastin [27].
The tunica adventitia contains a variety of cell types, including immune cells and fibroblasts. The ECM of the adventitia consists of fibrillar collagens and proteoglycans, like versican, that contribute to the compressibility of the vessel wall. In healthy arteries, versican is abundant in the adventitia, but during atherogenesis versican expression is also expressed by VSMCs and endothelial cells and contributes to the pathological retention of lipids in the vessel wall [27]. Finally, in some cases, like in mature atherosclerotic plaques or end-stage renal disease, the intima or media undergoes calcification, respectively, which further contributes to arterial stiffening [26–28]. For in depth overviews of the remodeling of the vascular ECM during arterial aging and atherosclerosis, please read the following reviews [23,24,29,30].
Measuring arterial stiffness in cardiovascular patients
The structural remodeling and stiffening of the arteries during aging is a strong prognostic indicator for cardiovascular risk, but it is not yet incorporated in routine clinical practice. One reason for this may be the wide variety of devices and methods that are being used to measure arterial stiffening. In this section we highlight pulse wave velocity (PWV), an ultrasound-based technique that is the golden standard in the clinic to assess arterial stiffness. The PWV is the speed of arterial pressure waves traveling along the arteries and is determined by taking the distance between two recording sites over the pulse transit time [31]. The pulse wave is typically measured at the carotid and femoral artery, as these sites provide reliable and reproducible measurements [32,33]. The brachial-ankle PWV is another established variant of PWV and has been reported to associate with cardiovascular risk factors to a similar extent [34]. However, in a retrospective study carotid-femoral PWV was a better predictor for heart failure [35].
The PWV provides an estimate of the average artery elasticity between the two recording sites. However, arterial stiffness is known to develop heterogeneously throughout the vascular system [36,37]. Ultrafast PWV is an upcoming technique that allows for detection of the local pulse wave at one site and is typically performed on the carotid artery, an area prone to atherosclerosis formation. This technique is not yet widely in practice in the clinic due to the lack of large population-based reference values of ultrafast PWV, but large cohort studies have demonstrated the reliability of this technique [38–41].
Upon a decrease in the elasticity of arteries (such as in old and stiff arteries), the propagation speed of the pulse wave increases resulting in higher PWV values. PWV values increase by age and is thus shown to be an independent predictor for cardiovascular risk. Current European guidelines point to a carotid-femoral PWV of more than 10 m/s as indicative of significant alterations of the vessel wall and high cardiovascular risk [32]. Clinical studies that demonstrate the association between PWV and cardiovascular disease have been previously reviewed [42▪].
In clinical practice, arterial stiffness is effectively synonymous to PWV. PWV levels are inversely related to the distensibility of arteries. The distensibility of an artery represents the relative change in cross-sectional area in response to pressure [31]. The distensibility thus represents the functional stiffness of the artery, which not only includes the composition of the artery (soft tissue properties, like the Young's modulus), but also properties like arterial diameter, blood pressure, and vascular tone (i.e., stiffness due to contractility cells in vascular wall). In other words, PWV is a technique that does not only assesses the structural remodeling and stiffening of the ECM during atherosclerosis. To measure the soft material properties of arteries, current techniques only allow for ex-vivo experimentation, where parts of the arteries are obtained from resected tissue of patients.
Ex-vivo mechanical measurements of vascular stiffening
Bulk mechanical tests of arterial stiffness
To study the soft material properties of arteries in the context of vascular stiffening during aging and the progression of atherosclerosis, a variety of mechanical tests can be used. The principle underlying these techniques is that a certain force is applied to the artery (compression or extension force) and subsequently its deformation is monitored. Depending on the technique, material properties can be examined from macroscale to the nanoscale, providing insight from bulk mechanics of the artery to layer-specific mechanical properties.
The mechanical properties of atherosclerotic tissue has been investigated for quite some time. The first study that directly measured the mechanical properties of atherosclerotic lesions was reported in 1966 [43]. Since then the bulk mechanical properties of arteries and plaques have been investigated by a wide variety of techniques [44]. These techniques can be categorized by their type of deformation, e.g., arterial inflation, compression or extension, and the direction of the applied force (radial, circumferential, or longitudinal)[45]. Uniaxial tensile testing has been a frequently applied technique to characterize atherosclerotic tissues and provides insights on the forces that atherosclerotic plaques are exposed to during in-vivo rupture. Of note, there is a large variability in the reported data, which limits the extent to which mechanical properties of plaques can be compared between studies. Such differences between uniaxial tensile studies on atherosclerotic plaques have been acknowledged, implicating that a more standardized protocol for tissue preparation, tissue handling, mechanical testing, and postprocessing of data is needed [46].
Here, we provide a summary of uniaxial tensile studies that have reported the ultimate tensile stress of human atherosclerotic plaques. The ultimate tensile strength represents the maximum stress the artery can withstand while being stretched before rupture of the tissue. Two studies that investigated human carotid arteries have reported similar rupture stresses of noncalcified plaques to be around 342 ± 160 kPa [47] and 366.6 ± 220.5 kPa [48]. Measurements on a small set of diverse human aortic plaques showed a comparable ultimate tensile strength of 484 ± 216 kPa [49]. Calcification of human atherosclerotic plaques further increases the stiffness of the plaque but does not directly increase the risk of plaque rupture [47,48,50]. Larger calcifications are correlated with a reduced risk in plaque rupture and are thought to stabilize the plaque, whereas superficial or spotty calcification increase the risk [51]. In the latter case, calcification is thought to make the plaque more susceptible to rupture by increasing the asymmetry in mechanical stresses within the plaque.
To obtain more insight in the differential stresses inside the plaque, researchers have separated the different layers of arteries (and plaques) before tensile testing. Characterization of the mechanical properties of different layers not only provides insight in the relative stiffness between each layer but could also help with modelling plaque rupture in situ[52,53]. Here, we overviewed studies that have performed biaxial tensile testing on separated layers of human arteries. Independent of vascular beds, the tunica adventitia has a much higher tensile strength than the media or the intima (Table 1). The adventitia is known for its role to dampen and dissipate energy from the pulsatile blood flow [54], which is likely reflected by the high tensile strength values. From these studies, it is not possible to provide a general conclusion on differences between the media or the intima, as the ultimate tensile strength is too variable. This variability could be explained by the different origins of the vascular bed, the stage of atherosclerosis, and/or the measured axis. Interestingly, in atherosclerotic carotid arteries, the media in the circumferential axis was stiffer compared to the longitudinal axis, but no differences were observed within the intima or adventitia (Table 1). The differences in tensile strength between the circumferential and longitudinal axes are likely attributed to the specific composition of the artery walls, which potentially also plays a role in the distinct susceptibility to plaque formation in different vascular beds. Interestingly, the intima of the iliac artery has a lower tensile strength in the atherosclerotic region as compared to nondiseased regions (Table 1), which reflects the fragility of the fibrous cap and the potential increased risk of rupture [56].
Table 1.
Ultimate tensile stress of the intima, media, and adventitia of human arteries from different vascular beds, tested in the circumferential and longitudinal direction (ultimate tensile stress in kPa, mean values ± SD)
| Ultimate tensile strength (kPa) per arterial layer | |||||
| Vessel | Condition | Intima | Media | Adventitia | Ref. |
| Measurements along circumferential axis | |||||
| Iliac | Nondiseased | 488.6 ± 185.6 | 202.0 ± 69.8 | 1031.6 ± 306.8 | [56] |
| Athero | 254.8 ± 79.8 | 1073.6 ± 289.3 | – | ||
| Coronary | Nondiseased | 394.0 ± 223.0 | 446.0 ± 194.0 | 1430.0 ± 604.0 | [55] |
| Carotid | Athero | 1022 ± 427 | 1230 ± 533 | 1802 ± 703 | [57] |
| Measurements along longitudinal axis | |||||
| Iliac | Nondiseased | 943.7 ± 272.3 | 188.8 ± 110.9 | 951.8 ± 209.0 | [56] |
| Athero | 468.6 ± 100.1 | 187.4 ± 8.3 | – | ||
| Coronary | Nondiseased | 391.0 ± 144.0 | 419.0 ± 188.0 | 1300.0 ± 692.0 | [55] |
| Carotid | Athero | 1047 ± 536 | 519 ± 270 | 1996 ± 867 | [57] |
Atomic force microscopy-based assessment of local arterial stiffness
While bulk mechanical testing is an established technique, the development of more accurate and precise tools has allowed the probing of mechanical properties of the vascular microenvironment in more detail to unravel the development of arterial stiffening on local cellular level. In particular, atomic force microscopy (AFM) is a valuable technique to assess the local topography and mechanical properties of tissues ex vivo, reaching a higher precision compared to for instance micro- and nano-indentation approaches. AFM uses a cantilever to indent the tissue to determine its local stiffness. In the last decade, AFM has become a broadly used method to study the stiffness of vascular cells and tissues both in vitro and ex vivo[58]. Next, we overviewed AFM studies that have assessed the mechanical changes of the vessel wall within the context of cardiovascular disease and aging (Table 2). Table 2 presents information on the type of tissue investigated and its associated elasticity, but also reports the applied probing direction and the geometry of the AFM tip. "Cross section” indicates a sagittal ring slice of the vessel, which allows for probing of the different layers of the artery. "En face” is when the vessel is opened longitudinally into a flat slice, which allows for reliable probing of the thin intimal layer from the luminal side [59]. Some studies opted for removing the endothelium when probing en face, to directly characterize the stiffness of the underlying basement membrane [21,60,61]. The relationship between the stiffness of the basement membrane and the endothelium is not well studied. One study directly compared the stiffness of intact and endothelial denuded bovine carotid arteries en face and found comparable stiffness values (2.5 kPa and 2.7 kPa, respectively [62]). Table 2 also includes the geometry of the used AFM probes, as this parameter has a pronounced effect on the reported stiffness of vascular tissue. For instance, a drastic change was observed in measured stiffness values of pulmonary vessels when the probe was changed from a pyramidal to a spherical shape (from 67.66 kPa to 8.36 kPa, respectively) [63] (Table 2). Taken together, the reported Young's modulus varies greatly between studies, with the lowest reported stiffness of 0.46 kPa for mouse aortic endothelium [64▪] and the highest stiffness of 2500 kPa for elastin fibers in the aorta of old mice [65▪] (Table 2). This variability in reported stiffness moduli cannot only be explained by differences in the AFM tip geometry and requires a close comparison of experimental conditions between studies, which is beyond the scope of this review.
Table 2.
Summary of AFM studies investigating the stiffness of arteries during the progression of cardiovascular disease and aging
| Vessel | Species | Age | Tissue | Condition | Young's modulus (kPa) | Probing | AFM tip (shape, radius) | Ref. |
| Atherosclerosis/ hypertension/ high-fat, high sucrose diet studies | ||||||||
| Coronary artery | Human | 39.3 ± 5.1 years | Media | No plaque | 10.7 ± 3.3 | Cross-section | Conical | [67▪▪] |
| 41.6 ± 3.8 years | Early plaque | 12.1 ± 3.1 | ||||||
| 45 ± 5.9 years | Advanced plaque | 15.5 ± 3.6 | ||||||
| 41.6 ± 3.8 years | Intima (fibrotic) | Early plaque | 8.7 ± 1.5 | |||||
| 45 ± 5.9 years | Advanced plaque | 17.6 ± 3.2 | ||||||
| Aorta | Mouse, ApoE-/- | 25–30 weeks | Intima | Lipid rich area | 5.5 ± 3.5 | Cross-section | Spherical, 5 μm or 12 μm | [68] |
| Fibrotic, SMC rich | 10.4 ± 5.7 | |||||||
| Fibrotic, hypocellular | 59.4 ± 47.4 | |||||||
| Aorta | Mouse, ApoE-/- | 42–56 weeks | Media | Control | 9.8 | Cross-section | Spherical, 5 μm | [70] |
| Lipid core | Atherosclerosis | 1.5 | ||||||
| Aorta | Mouse, ApoE/LDLR-/- | 6 months | Endothelium | Control | 0.46 ± 0.023 | En face | Spherical, 10 μm | [64▪] |
| Atherosclerosis | 0.56 ± 0.022 | |||||||
| Aorta | Mouse, ApoE-/- | 6 months | Endothelium | Control | 4.8a | En face | Spherical, 1 μm | [69] |
| Atherosclerosis | 15.4a | |||||||
| Pulmonary arterioles (diameter<100 μm) | Human | 18–71 years | Lung tissue | Control | 2.0a | Cross-section | Spherical, 2.5 μm | [73] |
| PAH | 3.6a | |||||||
| Ascending aorta | Mouse, C57BL/6 | 10–11 months | Endothelial denuded vessel | Normal diet | 24 ± 2.8 | En face | Spherical, 5 μm | [61] |
| High fat, high sucrose diet | 52 ± 4.8 | |||||||
| Aging studies | ||||||||
| Pulmonary arterioles (diameter<100 μm) | Human | 11–30 years | Lung tissue | Young | 5.06 ± 2.43 kPa | Cross-section | Spherical, 2.5 μm | [63] |
| 41–60 years | Old | 9.09 ± 4.28 kPa | ||||||
| Thoracic aorta | Mouse, C57BL/6 | 10–11 weeks | Endothelial denuded vessel | Young | 31.9 ± 4.5 | En face | Spherical, 10 μm | [21] |
| 20–25 months | Old | 70.6 ± 8.8 | ||||||
| Thoracic aorta | Mouse, C57BL/6 | 2 months | Endothelial denuded vessel | Young | 24.7a | En face | Spherical, 5 μm | [24] |
| 18 months | Old | 32.9a | ||||||
| Thoracic aorta | Mouse, C57BL/6 | 2 months | Endothelium | Young | 3.1a | En face | Spherical, 1 μm | [76] |
| 6 months | Middle aged | 3.6a | ||||||
| 12 months | Middle aged | 16.9a | ||||||
| 18 months | Old | 21.8a | ||||||
| Thoracic aorta | Mouse, C57BL/6 | 12 weeks | Endothelium | Young | 1.3a | En face | Conical tip | [77▪] |
| 86 weeks | Old | 1.9a | ||||||
| Ascending aorta | Mouse, C57BL/6 | 0.5 months | Intima | Young | 2.8a | En face | Spherical, 15 μm | [75] |
| 2.0 months | Middle aged | 5.1a | ||||||
| 3.5 months | Middle aged | 4.4a | ||||||
| 0.5 months | Media | Young | 12.8a | |||||
| 2.0 months | Middle aged | 38.7a | ||||||
| 3.5 months | Middle aged | 36.6a | ||||||
| Pulmonary artery | Bovine | 3 weeks (neonatal) | Intima | Young | 0.9a | Cross-section | Spherical, 5 μm | [74▪] |
| 20–30 months | Intima | Old | 2.5a | |||||
| 3 weeks (neonatal) | Media 1 | Young | 0.9a | |||||
| 20–30 months | Media 1 | Old | 1.5a | |||||
| 3 weeks (neonatal) | Media 2 | Young | 1.5a | |||||
| 20–30 months | Media 2 | Old | 2.5a | |||||
| 3 weeks (neonatal) | Adventitia | Young | 1.4a | |||||
| 20–30 months | Adventitia | Old | 1.3a | |||||
| Aorta | Mouse, C57BL/6 | 1 month | Elastin fibers between SMCs | Young | 90 ± 20 | Cross-section | Pyramid | [65▪] |
| 5 months | Middle aged | 510 ± 100 | Conical | |||||
| 10 months | Middle aged | 1200 ± 330 | Conical | |||||
| 20 months | Old | 2500 ± 260 | Conical | |||||
In cases where no exact stiffness values were reported, values were estimated from graphs. These values are marked in the table with an a. AFM, atomic force microscopy, SMC, smooth muscle cell.
The first study to characterize human plaques by nanoindentation, used a probe tip with a diameter of 200 μm and indentation depth of 5 μm, and reported Young's moduli of 270 ± 150 kPa for fibrous tissue, 2.1 ± 5.4 MPa for partially calcified fibrous tissue, and 0.7 ± 2.3 GPa for calcified tissue [66]. To our knowledge, a decade later, only one study has used AFM to elaborately examine the stiffness of the different layers of the human arterial wall and plaque components during atherosclerotic development [67▪▪]. This study categorized coronary arteries into healthy, mildly diseased, and advanced atherosclerotic plaques and investigated the elasticity of the internal and external elastic laminas, the media, and the plaque components during disease progression. The stiffness of the internal elastic lamina decreased (from 34.9 kPa to 24.8 kPa), while the stiffness of the external elastic lamina and the media did not change so much (from 34.2 kPa to 31.9 kPa) [67▪▪]. The media and intima layers increased in stiffness during plaque progression and have a comparable stiffness in the advanced plaque (Table 2). Within the atherosclerotic plaques, the lipid core was the least stiff area (2.7 ± 1.8 kPa), whereas the calcified areas were the most stiff (96.1 ± 18.8) [67▪▪].
Due to the limited availability of human vascular material, the ApoE and LDLR knockout atherosclerotic mouse models have been used to study arterial stiffening during atherosclerosis [64▪,68–70]. In AFM studies performed on mouse aortic atherosclerotic plaques, the lipid core was also the lowest reported elasticity, with reported Young's moduli of 5.5 kPa ± 3.5 [68] and 1.5kPa [70] and has a similar elasticity to the human lipid core. It is however hard to draw a general conclusion concerning the stiffness regulation within the arterial wall, as the examined plaque components and the order of magnitude of the Young's moduli varies drastically (Table 2). The atherosclerotic plaque of mice differs considerably in its biomechanical composition compared to human plaques and is considered resistant to plaque rupture [71]. The use of tissue-engineered plaques to study the mechanical properties of human plaque could be an interesting alternative [72▪].
To study the effect of aging on arterial stiffness, the stiffness of young and old blood vessels have been compared based on various AFM experiments (Table 2). There is however no clear consensus age cutoff that defines young or old human vessels in current literature. In a study investigating the stiffness of human pulmonary arterioles, tissues above 40 years old were considered old and these arterioles showed almost a twofold increase in stiffness [63]. Of note, arterial stiffening has not only been observed in large arteries, but also in aged human pulmonary arterioles and in pulmonary arterial hypertension [73,74▪]. In the mouse studies generally tissues above 20 months of age were considered old (Table 2). The earliest increase in arterial stiffness, measured by AFM en face, was already observed between aortas from 0.5 month old mice and 2 months old mice [75]. Interestingly, in this study there was no further increase observed in arterial stiffness between 2 and 3 months old mice. Similarly, another study found no increase in arterial stiffness of the aorta between 2 months old and 6 months old mice [76]. However, the arterial stiffness did drastically increase between 6 months old and 12 months old mice. These results indicate that arterial stiffness might increase during specific moments of the lifespan of mice (i.e., before 2 months of age, and from 6 months and older). By contrast, by applying cross-sectional AFM on mouse aorta, it was found that elastin fibers increase in stiffness between 1 month old and 5 months old mice [65▪], indicating potential differential regulation of ECM components during aging. In line with this, arterial stiffening was mainly observed in the intima and media, but not the adventitia in aging pulmonary arteries [74▪]. In this study, the Young's modulus of the intima, media, and adventitia of the aorta, carotid, and pulmonary arteries were compared. See Table 2 for the discussed experimental results. Interestingly, the Young's modulus was similar between the arterial layers, while the tensile strength of the adventitia has previously been reported to be significantly higher (see Table 1). The adventitia is perhaps not so stiff during compression or has a relatively low stiffness at small deformations (as applied during AFM). These observations show that different mechanical tests can provide complementary insights of the mechanical properties of aging arteries. In addition, some studies have compared AFM and PWV techniques to investigate the relationship between stiffness as a material property and functional stiffness in vivo; and a striking linear positive correlation was found between wave velocity and the Young's modulus [60,65▪].
Stiffness-induced endothelial dysfunction
How changes in mechanical forces in the vascular microenvironment affect endothelial functions and play a prominent role in atherosclerosis development has been extensively overviewed before [78–80]. Vascular stiffening disturbs endothelial barrier function [20]. The stiffness of the vessel wall ECM is sensed on an endothelial cell level through integrin-based adhesions, which signal and transmit forces from ECM to the intracellular actomyosin cytoskeleton [81]. In turn, contraction of the actomyosin cytoskeleton exerts tension on VE-cadherin- and PECAM1-based endothelial cell-cell junctions [82–84]. The excessive stiffening of the vessel wall in aging arteries perturbs this mechanotransduction response and thereby weakens the endothelial cell-cell junctions [19,24], resulting in leaky endothelium, increased inflammation and driving the development of hypertension and atherosclerosis [20,24,85,86]. The vascular wall of the aorta and other arteries from ApoE-/- mice are stiffer than in wild type mice, which is caused by increased ECM deposition and crosslinking by lysyl oxidase, rather than their high plasma cholesterol levels [69]. The stiffening was partially reversible, as treatments with a lysyl oxidase inhibitor reduced arterial stiffness and atherosclerosis development. The importance of endothelial actomyosin activation for atherogenesis, downstream of stiffness sensing, is further demonstrated by experiments which showed that deficiency of myosin light-chain kinase, an important activator of actomyosin contraction, attenuates endothelial permeability in this atherosclerotic mouse model [87]. In addition, the inhibition of Rho kinase-mediated actomyosin contractility, improved endothelial barrier function in stiff aorta of aged mice [21]. ECM stiffness also activates the transcriptional co-activators YAP and TAZ in endothelial cells [88,89], which are important drivers of atherosclerosis development [90,91]. Interestingly, there is tight crosstalk between YAP/TAZ activation and endothelial metabolism, including the control of glycolysis, amino acid synthesis, lipid synthesis, and mitochondrial activity [92,93]. This may explain why age-related arterial stiffening is worsened by diabetes and metabolic syndromes in cardiovascular patients [94].
CONCLUSION
Atherosclerosis remains a leading cause of mortality worldwide, despite being one of the research focuses for decades. With this review, we highlighted the knowledge concerning vascular stiffening and mention endothelial mechano-responses downstream of stiffness-sensing as a key process for therapeutic targeting to attenuate atherogenesis. Improving our knowledge regarding the changes in mechanical properties of the human arterial wall during aging and implementing them in in-vitro experimental setups that assess endothelial cell function, will be crucial to search for effective targeting strategies that inhibit the atherogenic endothelial contribution.
Statins are widely known to lower cholesterol levels by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A, a key enzyme in cholesterol synthesis. In addition to its cholesterol-lowering effect, statins have attenuated arterial stiffness in vitro and in human clinical studies by alleviating stiffness-induced Rho-mediated endothelial mechano-responses [95,96]. Statins also suppress YAP/TAZ activity and thereby inhibit vascular inflammation [90]. Statin therapies have been in the clinic for many years and have proven to be safe and effective, to a certain extent, preventing cardiovascular events regardless of the patient's age [97]. Another promising therapeutic for the treatment of atherosclerosis is the RhoA/ROCK inhibitor fasudil. This drug improves endothelial function in experimental cardiovascular animal models [98,99]. However, a clinical study has yet to confirm this promising effect for patients. The clinical trial NCT02145468 investigated the effects of fasudil on carotid atherosclerosis but was terminated in 2017 due to poor enrollment [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00670202].
It is important to note that nontherapeutical approaches have been investigated to reduce arterial stiffness. A healthy lifestyle has been widely shown to increase cardiovascular health [100]. In experimental settings, arterial stiffness was reduced when obese mice were switched to a normal diet, or when old mice were forced to physical exercise [59,60]. Finally, stiffening of arteries during aging raises the risk of cardiovascular disease in both men and women. Intriguingly, the vasculature is less stiff in young women compared to age-matched men, yet arterial stiffening is strongly elevated in aged women compared to men [101,102]. This indicates that there is an unequal increase in stiffening in postmenopausal women. It is therefore very important to consider sex an important variable in future cardiovascular research that explores age-related stiffening.
Acknowledgements
None.
Financial support and sponsorship
This study was financially supported by the Dutch Heart Foundation (Dekker Established Investigator grant 03-002-2021-T087) and the Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences institute.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
▪ of special interest
▪▪ of outstanding interest
REFERENCES
- 1.Roth GA, Mensah GA, Johnson CO, et al. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 76:2982–3021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Townsend N, Wilson L, Bhatnagar P, et al. Cardiovascular disease in Europe: epidemiological update 2016. Eur Heart J 2016; 2004:3232–3245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Ungvari Z, Tarantini S, Donato AJ, et al. Mechanisms of vascular aging. Circ Res 2018; 123:849–867. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Lakatta EG. Central arterial aging and the epidemic of systolic hypertension and atherosclerosis. J Am Soc Hypertens 2007; 1:302–340. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mattace-Raso FUS, van der Cammen TJM, Hofman A, et al. Arterial stiffness and risk of coronary heart disease the Rotterdam Study. Circulation 2006; 113:657–663. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Mattace-Raso F, Hofman A, Verwoert GC, et al. Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: ‘ establishing normal and reference values’. Clin Res 2010; 185:2338–2350. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Verdecchia P, Porcellati C, Reboldi G, et al. Left ventricular hypertrophy as an independent predictor of acute cerebrovascular events in essential hypertension. Circulation 2001; 104:2039–2044. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ghali JK, Liao Y, Cooper RS. Influence of left ventricular geometric patterns on prognosis in patients with or without coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:1635–1640. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Blacher J, Fournier V, Asmar R, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity as a marker of atherosclerosis in hypertension. Cardiovasc Rev Rep 2001; 22:420–425. [Google Scholar]
- 10.Timmis A, Townsend N, Gale C, et al. European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2017. Eur Heart J 2018; 39:508–579. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Herrington DM, Brown WV, Mosca L, et al. Relationship between arterial stiffness and subclinical aortic atherosclerosis. Circulation 2004; 110:432–437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mitchell GF, Hwang S-J, Vasan RS, et al. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2010; 121:505–511. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Kaess BM, Rong J, Larson MG, et al. Aortic stiffness, blood pressure progression, and incident hypertension. JAMA 2012; 308:875–881. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Liao J, Farmer J. Arterial stiffness as a risk factor for coronary artery disease. Curr Atheroscler Rep 2014; 16:387. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Blacher J, Asmar R, Djane S, et al. Aortic pulse wave velocity as a marker of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients. Hypertension 1999; 33:1111–1117. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Lampi MC, Reinhart-King CA. Targeting extracellular matrix stiffness to attenuate disease: from molecular mechanisms to clinical trials. Sci Transl Med 2018; 10:1–15. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kraaijenhof JM, Hovingh GK, Stroes ESG, Kroon J. The iterative lipid impact on inflammation in atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 2021; 32:286–292. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Lutgens E, Atzler D, Döring Y, et al. Immunotherapy for cardiovascular disease. Eur Heart J 2019; 40:3937–3946. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Krishnan R, Klumpers DD, Park CY, et al. Substrate stiffening promotes endothelial monolayer disruption through enhanced physical forces. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2011; 300:C146–C154. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Huveneers S, Daemen MJAP, Hordijk PL. Between Rho(k) and a hard place: the relation between vessel wall stiffness, endothelial contractility, and cardiovascular disease. Circ Res 2015; 116:895–908. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Huynh J, Nishimura N, Rana K, et al. Age-related intimal stiffening enhances endothelial permeability and leukocyte transmigration. Sci Transl Med 2011; 3: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22▪▪.Beldman TJ, Malinova TS, Desclos E, et al. Nanoparticle-aided characterization of arterial endothelial architecture during atherosclerosis progression and metabolic therapy. ACS Nano 2019; 13:13759–13774. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In-vivo study in which improvement of endothelial barrier function attenuated atherosclerosis.
- 23.Eble J, Niland S. The extracellular matrix of blood vessels. Curr Pharm Des 2009; 15:1385–1400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kohn JC, Lampi MC, Reinhart-King CA. Age-related vascular stiffening: Causes and consequences. Front Genet 2015; 6:1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Di Russo J, Luik A-L, Yousif L, et al. Endothelial basement membrane laminin 511 is essential for shear stress response. EMBO J 2017; 36:183–201. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Chistiakov DA, Sobenin IA, Orekhov AN. Vascular extracellular matrix in atherosclerosis. Cardiol Rev 2013; 21:270–288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Souilhol C, Harmsen MC, Evans PC, Krenning G. Endothelial-mesenchymal transition in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res 2018; 114:565–577. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Jablonski KL, Chonchol M. Vascular calcification in end-stage renal disease. Hemodial Int 2013; 17: (SUPPL1): 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Milutinović A, Šuput D, Zorc-Pleskovič R. Pathogenesis of atherosclerosis in the tunica intima, media, and adventitia of coronary arteries: An updated review. Bosn J Basic Med Sci 2020; 20:21–30. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Barallobre-Barreiro J, Loeys B, Mayr M, et al. Extracellular matrix in vascular disease, Part 2/4: JACC Focus Seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol 2020; 75:2189–2203. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Segers P, Rietzschel ER, Chirinos JA. How to measure arterial stiffness in humans. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2020; 1034–1043. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Mancia G, De Backer G, Dominiczak A, et al. 2007 Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension. J Hypertens 2007; 25:1105–1187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Blacher J, Pannier B, Guerin AP, et al. Carotid arterial stiffness as a predictor of cardiovascular and all-cause mortality in end-stage renal disease. Hypertens (Dallas, Tex 1979) 1998; 32:570–574. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Tanaka H, Munakata M, Kawano Y, et al. Comparison between carotid-femoral and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity as measures of arterial stiffness. J Hypertens 2009; 27:2022–2027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Lee CJ, Yoon M, Ha J, et al. Comparison of the association between arterial stiffness indices and heart failure in patients with high cardiovascular risk: a retrospective study. Front Cardiovasc Med 2021; 8:782849. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Zhang Y, Agnoletti D, Protogerou AD, et al. Characteristics of pulse wave velocity in elastic and muscular arteries: a mismatch beyond age. J Hypertens 2013; 31:554–559. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lee HY, Oh B H. Aging and arterial stiffness. Circ J 2010; 74:2257–2262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Bai X, Liu W, Huang H, You H. Ultrafast pulse wave velocity and ensemble learning to predict atherosclerosis risk. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2022; 27:1–9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Yin LX, Liu W, Huang H, You H. Reference values of carotid ultrafast pulse-wave velocity: a prospective, multicenter, population-based study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2021; 34:629–641. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Pan FS, Yu L, Luo J, et al. Carotid artery stiffness assessment by ultrafast ultrasound imaging: feasibility and potential influencing factors. J Ultrasound Med 2018; 37:2759–2767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Zhu ZQ, Chen L-S, Wang H, et al. Carotid stiffness and atherosclerotic risk: noninvasive quantification with ultrafast ultrasound pulse wave velocity. Eur Radiol 2019; 29:1507–1517. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42▪.Kim HL, Kim SH. Pulse wave velocity in atherosclerosis. Front Cardiovasc Med 2019; 6:1–13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Review summarizing the relation between pulse wave velocity, the clinical parameter for arterial stiffening, and atherosclerosis.
- 43.Learoyd BBM, Taylor MG. Alterations with age in the viscoelastic properties of human arterial walls. Circ Res 1966; XVIII:278–292. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Sadat U, Teng Z, Gillard JH. Biomechanical structural stresses of atherosclerotic plaques. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2010; 8:1469–1481. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Dessalles CA, Leclech C, Castagnino A, Barakat AI. Integration of substrate- and flow-derived stresses in endothelial cell mechanobiology. Commun Biol 2021; 4:764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Walsh MT, Cunnane EM, Mulvihill JJ, et al. Uniaxial tensile testing approaches for characterisation of atherosclerotic plaques. J Biomech 2014; 47:793–804. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Mulvihill JJ, Cunnane EM, McHugh SM, et al. Mechanical, biological and structural characterization of in vitro ruptured human carotid plaque tissue. Acta Biomater 2013; 9:9027–9035. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lawlor MG, O’Donnell MR, O’Connell BM, Walsh MT. Experimental determination of circumferential properties of fresh carotid artery plaques. J Biomech 2011; 44:1709–1715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Loree HM, Grodzinsky AJ, Park SY, et al. Static circumferential tangential modulus tissue. J Biomech 1994; 27:195–204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Maher E, Creane A, Sultan S, et al. Tensile and compressive properties of fresh human carotid atherosclerotic plaques. J Biomech 2009; 42:2760–2767. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Shi X, Gao J, Lv Q, et al. Calcification in atherosclerotic plaque vulnerability: friend or foe? Front Physiol 2020; 11:1–12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Holzapfel GA. Nonlinear solid mechanics: a continuum approach for engineering science. Meccanica 2002; 37:489–490. [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jorba I, Mostert D, Hermans L H L, et al. In vitro methods to model cardiac mechanobiology in health and disease. Tissue Eng Part C Methods 2021; 27:139–151. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Grant CA, Twigg PC. Pseudostatic and dynamic nanomechanics of the tunica adventitia in elastic arteries using atomic force microscopy. ACS Nano 2013; 7:456–464. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Holzapfel GA, Sommer G, Gasser CT, Regitnig P. Determination of layer-specific mechanical properties of human coronary arteries with nonatherosclerotic intimal thickening and related constitutive modeling. Am J Physiol - Hear Circ Physiol 2005; 289:2048–2058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Holzapfel GA, Sommer G, Regitnig P. Anisotropic mechanical properties of tissue components in human atherosclerotic plaques. J Biomech Eng 2004; 126:657–665. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Teng Z, Tang D, Zheng J, et al. An experimental study on the ultimate strength of the adventitia and media of human atherosclerotic carotid arteries in circumferential and axial directions. J Biomech 2009; 42:2535–2539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Jorba I, Uriarte JJ, Campillo N, et al. Probing micromechanical properties of the extracellular matrix of soft tissues by atomic force microscopy. J Cell Physiol 2017; 232:19–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Lee J, Rao S, Kaushik G, et al. Dehomogenized elastic properties of heterogeneous layered materials in AFM indentation experiments. Biophys J 2018; 114:2717–2731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Kohn JC, Chen A, Cheng S, et al. Mechanical heterogeneities in the subendothelial matrix develop with age and decrease with exercise. J Biomech 2016; 49:1447–1453. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Weisbrod RM, Shiang T, Al Sayah L, et al. Arterial stiffening precedes systolic hypertension in diet-induced obesity. Hypertension 2013; 1105–1110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Peloquin J, Huynh J, Williams RM, Reinhart-king CA. Indentation measurements of the subendothelial matrix in bovine carotid arteries. J Biomech 2011; 44:815–821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Sicard D, Fredenburgh LE, Tschumperlin DJ. Measured pulmonary arterial tissue stiffness is highly sensitive to AFM indenter dimensions. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater 2017; 74 (February):118–127. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64▪.Maase M, Rygula A, Pacia MZ, et al. Combined Raman- and AFM-based detection of biochemical and nanomechanical features of endothelial dysfunction in aorta isolated from ApoE /LDLR − /− mice. Nanomedicine 2019; 16:97–105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In-vivo study demonstrating the link between endothelial dysfunction and aortic stiffening during atherosclerosis development.
- 65▪.Berquand A, Wahart A, Henry A, et al. Revealing the elasticity of an individual aortic fiber during ageing at nanoscale by: In situ atomic force microscopy. Nanoscale 2021; 13:1124–1133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Ex-vivo study investigating age-dependent stiffening ECM structures at nanoscale resolution, demonstrating current advanced possibilities in AFM microscopy.
- 66.Ebenstein DM, Coughlin D, Chapman J, et al. Nanomechanical properties of calcification, fibrous tissue, and hematoma from atherosclerotic plaques. J Biomed Mater Res 2008; 91A:1028–1037. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67▪▪.Rezvani-Sharif A, Tafazzoli-Shadpour M, Avolio A. Progressive changes of elastic moduli of arterial wall and atherosclerotic plaque components during plaque development in human coronary arteries. Med Biol Eng Comput 2019; 57:731–740. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Thorough investigation of the mechanical properties of plaque components between different stages of human plaques.
- 68.Tracqui P, Broisat A, Toczek J, et al. Mapping elasticity moduli of atherosclerotic plaque in situ via atomic force microscopy. J Struct Biol 2011; 174:115–123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kothapalli D, Liu S-H, Bae YH, et al. Cardiovascular protection by ApoE and ApoE-HDL linked to suppression of ECM gene expression and arterial stiffening. Cell Rep 2012; 2:1259–1271. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Hayenga HN, Trache A, Trzeciakowski J, Humphrey JD. Regional atherosclerotic plaque properties in ApoE-/-mice quantified by atomic force, immunofluorescence, and light microscopy. J Vasc Res 2011; 48:495–504. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.van der Heiden K, Hoogendoorn A, Daemen MJ, Gijsen FJH. Animal models for plaque rupture: a biomechanical assessment. Thromb Haemost 2016; 115:501–508. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72▪.Wissing TB, Van der Heiden K, Serra SM, et al. Tissue-engineered collagenous fibrous cap models to systematically elucidate atherosclerotic plaque rupture. Sci Rep 2022; 12:5434. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; First study-using tissue-engineered fibrous caps to elucidate the impact of mechanical forces in plaque rupture.
- 73.Liu F, Haeger CM, Dieffenbach PB, et al. Distal vessel stiffening is an early and pivotal mechanobiological regulator of vascular remodeling and pulmonary hypertension. JCI Insight 2016; 1:1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74▪.Rafuse M, Xu X, Stenmark K, et al. Layer-specific arterial micromechanics and microstructure: Influences of age, anatomical location, and processing technique. J Biomech 2019; 88:113–121. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; Elaborate in-vivo study (in pigs) analyzing the mechanical properties of the arterial wall layers during ageing and between different vascular beds.
- 75.Lee J-J, Galatioto J, Rao S, et al. Losartan attenuates degradation of aorta and lung tissue micromechanics in a mouse model of severe marfan syndrome. J Biomech 2016; 44:2994–3006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Liu S, Bae YH, Yu C, et al. Matrix metalloproteinase-12 is an essential mediator of acute and chronic arterial stiffening. Sci Rep 2015; 5:17189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77▪.Soares RN, Ramirez-Perez FI, Cabral-Amador FJ, et al. SGLT2 inhibition attenuates arterial dysfunction and decreases vascular F-actin content and expression of proteins associated with oxidative stress in aged mice. GeroScience 2022; 44:1657–1675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; In-vivo study targeting arterial-stiffness induced endothelial dysfunction to attenuate the onset of cardiovascular disease.
- 78.Hahn C, Schwartz MA. Mechanotransduction in vascular physiology and atherogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009; 10:53–62. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Davies PF. Hemodynamic shear stress and the endothelium in cardiovascular pathophysiology. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2009; 6:16–26. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Gimbrone MAJ, Topper JN, Nagel T, et al. Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000; 902:230–240. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Kechagia JZ, Ivaska J, Roca-Cusachs P. Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2019; 20:457–473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Arif N, Zinnhardt M, Antu AN, et al. PECAM-1 supports leukocyte diapedesis by tension-dependent dephosphorylation of VE-cadherin. EMBO J 2021; 40:e106113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Huveneers S, Oldenburg J, Spanjaard E, et al. Vinculin associates with endothelial VE-cadherin junctions to control force-dependent remodeling. J Cell Biol 2012; 196:641–652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Liu Z, Tan JL, Cohen DM, et al. Mechanical tugging force regulates the size of cell-cell junctions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010; 107:9944–9949. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.VanderBurgh JA, Reinhart-King CA. The role of age-related intimal remodeling and stiffening in atherosclerosis. Adv Pharmacol 2018; 81:365–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Laurent S, Boutouyrie P, Lacolley P. Structural and genetic bases of arterial stiffness. Hypertens (Dallas, Tex 1979) 2005; 45:1050–1055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Sun C, Wu MH, Yuan SY. Nonmuscle myosin light-chain kinase deficiency attenuates atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice via reduced endothelial barrier dysfunction and monocyte migration. Circulation 2011; 124:48–57. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Hooglugt A, van der Stoel MM, Boon RA, Huveneers S. Endothelial YAP/TAZ signaling in angiogenesis and tumor vasculature. Front Oncol 2020; 10:612802. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Dupont S, Morsut L, Aragona M, et al. Role of YAP/TAZ in mechanotransduction. Nature 2011; 474:179–183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Wang L, Luo J-Y, Tian XY, et al. Integrin-YAP/TAZ-JNK cascade mediates atheroprotective effect of unidirectional shear flow. Nature 2016; 540:579–582. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Wang K-C, Yeh Y-T, Nguyen P, et al. Flow-dependent YAP/TAZ activities regulate endothelial phenotypes and atherosclerosis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2016; 113:11525–11530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Bertero T, Oldham WM, Cottrill KA, et al. Vascular stiffness mechanoactivates YAP/TAZ-dependent glutaminolysis to drive pulmonary hypertension. J Clin Invest 2016; 126:3313–3335. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Romani P, Valcarcel-Jimenez L, Frezza C, Dupont S. Crosstalk between mechanotransduction and metabolism. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2021; 22:22–38. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Stehouwer CDA, Henry RMA, Ferreira I. Arterial stiffness in diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: a pathway to cardiovascular disease. Diabetologia 2008; 51:527–539. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Lampi MC, Faber CJ, Huynh J, et al. Simvastatin ameliorates matrix stiffness-mediated endothelial monolayer disruption. PLoS One 2016; 11:1–20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Liu P-Y, Liu Y-W, Lin L-J, et al. Evidence for statin pleiotropy in humans: differential effects of statins and ezetimibe on rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase activity, endothelial function, and inflammation. Circulation 2009; 119:131–138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ Collaboration. Efficacy and safety of statin therapy in older people: a meta-analysis of individual participant data from 28 randomised controlled trials. Lancet (London, England) 2019; 393:407–415. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Zhuang R, Wu J, Lin F, et al. Fasudil preserves lung endothelial function and reduces pulmonary vascular remodeling in a rat model of end-stage pulmonary hypertension with left heart disease. Int J Mol Med 2018; 42:1341–1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 99.Hattori T, Shimokawa H, Higashi M, et al. Long-term treatment with a specific Rho-kinase inhibitor suppresses cardiac allograft vasculopathy in mice. Circ Res 2004; 94:46–52. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 100.Rossman MJ, Kaplon RE, Hill SD, et al. Endothelial cell senescence with aging in healthy humans: prevention by habitual exercise and relation to vascular endothelial function. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2017; 313:H890–H895. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 101.Ogola BO, Zimmerman MA, Clark GL, et al. New insights into arterial stiffening: does sex matter? Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2018; 315:H1073–H1087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 102.DuPont JJ, Kenney RM, Patel A R, Jaffe I Z. Sex differences in mechanisms of arterial stiffness. Br J Pharmacol 2019; 176:4208–4225. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

