Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 25;11(4):e4946. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000004946

Table 4.

Ectotherm Model Organisms: Surgical Outcomes

First Author (Year of Publication) Number of Eyes Viable after Surgery Perfusion Recorded Ocular Movement Nervous Test Type of Elicit Response Responses Recorded Vision Return
Keeler (1930)24 23 Yes No Yes Light-pupillary response 17/17 (100%) 0/23 (0%)
Stone (1930)27 74 Yes 33 Yes Light-pupillary response 6/6 (100%) 6/6 (100%)
Stone (1937)30 52 Yes 52 Yes Light-pupillary response 52/52 (100%) 25/26 (96.2%)
Schwind (1937)30 95 No “The majority” No N/A N/A 0/95 (0%)
Stone (1938)26 N/R Yes “Most” Yes Light-pupillary response “Many” 80/700 (11.4%)
Stone (1940)29 48 Yes 48 Yes Light-pupillary response 6/6 (100%) 0% (0/4)
Weiss (1942)32 40 No No Yes Baro-response (eyelid-closure) 38/40 (95%) NR
Stone (1943)28 15 Yes “Many” Yes Light-pupillary response 13/26 (50%) 4/26 (15.4%)
Sperry (1945)33 22 (12 adults, 10 tadpoles) No 14 (2 tadpoles, 12 adults) Yes Object recognition (optokinetic move) 2/30 (tadpoles)
8/16 (adults)
2/30 (tadpoles)
12/16 (adults)
Stone (1945)4 33 No “Most eyes” Yes Light-pupillary response 33/33 (100%) 8/33 (24.2%)
Stone (1946)5 12 Yes 12 Yes Light-pupillary response 12/56 (17.65%) 12/56 (17.65%)
Sperry (1949)34 22 Yes “Several” Yes Object recognition (optokinetic move) 7/16 (43.75%) 7/16 (43.75%)
Bytinski-Salz (1956)35 19 No No No N/A N/A No
Heath (1957)36 14 Yes No No N/A N/A N/R
Stone (July 1964)25 10 Yes No Yes Light-pupillary response 7/10 (70%) 7/10 (70%)
Stone (December 1964)25 17 Yes No Yes Light-pupillary response 9/17 (52.9%) 9/17 (52.9%)
Schneider (1968)37 21 No 19 Yes Light 21/21 (100%) 21/21 (100%)
Pietsch (1985)38 19 No No Yes Melanophore changes 19/25 (76%) N/R
Pietsch (1988)39 88 Yes No Yes Melanophore changes 18/22 (heterograft)
17/22 (autograft)
N/R

N/A, not applicable; N/R, not recorded.