Table 2.
Path2Integrity | Integrity | VIRTUE | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Target | Index/test-instrument | Target | Index/test-instrument | Target | Index/test-instrument | |
Projects’ aim on level 4 | RCR | None exists | RCR | None exists | RCR | None exists |
Projects’ examples for level 3 | Compare and prioritize different handlings of proper data management | P2I group discussions | Constructively and transparently work together with junior researchers and senior researchers | Integrity reflection questions | Relate virtues to norms of action when faced with moral conflicts or dilemmas | VIRTUE evaluation survey |
Projects’ examples level 2 | Discard arguments that cannot be justified | P2I pre-post questionnaire | Transparently discuss the roles and responsibilities you and your mentors have during your Ph.D. project and how these will (have to) shift up until your graduation |
(1) Integrity randomised control trial (2) PDR from St. Louis (3) assignment evaluation |
Consider, choose and defend (and possibly reconsider) alternative courses of action in response to a moral dilemma in an RI case | VIRTUE self-assessment |
Projects’ examples level 1 | None exists | P2I feedback sheet | None exists | Evaluation module using likert scales and open questions | None exists | VIRTUE self-assessment |