Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 25;7:23. doi: 10.1186/s41747-023-00333-0

Table 3.

Quantitative analysis results on diameter measurement accuracy, blooming and inter-stent distinction

Mean error towards true diameter Blooming Inter-stent distinction
150-mm FOV Si-PCCT 0.17 mm (± 0.16 mm)* 18.3% (± 2.6%)** 80.7% (± 7.6%)**
EIDCT 0.59 mm (± 0.26 mm)* 32.4% (± 4.6%)** 49% (± 15.8%)**
50-mm FOV Si-PCCT 0.21 mm (± 0.26 mm) 15.3% (± 3.3%)** 84% (± 11.8%)*
EIDCT 0.26 mm (± 0.19 mm) 28.1% (± 3.7%)** 60.9% (± 8.5%)*

EIDCT Energy-integrating computed tomography, FOV Field-of-view, PCCT Photon-counting computed tomography

*p < 0.01, **p < 0.001 (two-tailed) when comparing Si-PCCT to EIDCT