TABLE 5.

Significant effects of the MTASQ score on discomfort-related activation (second approach).

MTASQ dimensions	Brain region	Peak				Cluster		Another model (t)
		x	y	z	t	k	p
Individual model
Motivational decline	n.s.
Active behavior	n.s.
Proactive response	L. Superior parietal lobule	−30	−54	52	−5.34	506	0.001	−1.72	*
	L. Angular gyrus	−30	−66	42	−4.33
	L. Supramarginal gyrus	−38	−46	42	−4.01
Average model
Motivational decline	L. Inferior frontal gyrus	−50	28	8	4.87	464	0.001
	L. Middle frontal gyrus	−46	32	14	4.58			1.72	*
	L. Superior temporal gyrus	−50	−50	18	4.19	852	0.001	1.93	*
	L. Superior parietal lobule	−14	−56	56	4.58	257	0.029
Active behavior	n.s.
Proactive response	n.s.

The results of the voxel-wise exploration of the significant effect of the MTASQ scores (i.e., regression analysis) on discomfort-related activation. At each peak voxel, the t-value for the effect of the same MTASQ score on discomfort-related activation in another model is given when significant. Other details are the same as for Table 4.