Table 2.
Implementation outcomes [IO; (36)] and EquIR (35) frameworks for thematic analysis of qualitative components.
| Implementation outcomes | Definition |
|---|---|
| Acceptability | IO: The perception among implementation stakeholders that a given treatment, service, practice, or innovation is agreeable, palatable, or satisfactory. |
| Appropriateness | IO: The perceived fit, relevance, or compatibility of the innovation or evidence-based practice for a given practice setting, provider, or consumer; and/or perceived fit of the innovation to address a particular issue or problem. |
| Coverage | EquIR: The degree of reach, access, service spread or effective coverage for the disadvantaged target population. |
| Feasibility | EquIR: The extent to which a program reduces barriers and can be carried out in disadvantaged population. |
| Fidelity | IO: Comparing the original evidence-based intervention and the disseminated/implemented intervention in terms of (1) adherence to the program protocol, (2) dose or amount of program delivered, and (3) quality of program delivery.EquIR: Adherence of disadvantaged populations to equity-focused implementation of intervention. |