Table 4.
The advantages and disadvantages of the four methods and possible effective improvements.
Methods | Advantages | Disadvantages | Improvements |
---|---|---|---|
MLR | Simple and easy to operate | (1) Biomarkers paradox (2) co-linearity (3) Regression equation edge distortion | (1) Z-score correction edge distortion (14) (2) Co-linearity diagnosis and removal of redundant variables |
PCA | (1) Avoid co-linearity (54) (2) Further screen aging biomarkers (3) |
(1) Biomarkers paradox (2) Regression equation edge distortion |
Z-score correction edge distortion (14) |
KDM | (1) Resolving the biomarker paradox (2) Avoiding distortion at the edges of the regression equation (76) (3) Suitable for non-linear biomarkers (17) |
(1) Complicated calculation (54) (2) CA as a marker of aging is controversial (34) |
(1) Cho et al. improved the calculation process (54) (2) Calculating individual △age is more practical than BA (34) |
Deep learning | (1) Good at handling high-dimensional dataset (67) (2) The machine extracts features autonomously by learning (67) |
(1) Difficulty in building large data (8) (2) The existence of a “black box” and uncontrollable results (3) Excellent programming skills and computer hardware and software support required |
(1) Suitable methods can be explored to clarify the weighting of each aging biomarker (2) Multidisciplinary Cooperation |
MLR, multiple linear regression; PCA, principal component analysis; KDM, Klemera and Doubal’s method.