Table 4.
Effect of regularization on SRH using hybrid models.
| SRH |
||
|---|---|---|
| Model 1 |
Model 2 |
|
| B coeff (95% CI) | B coeff (95% CI) | |
| Applicant (ref. undocumented) (within-individual effect) | 0.19 (−0.00, 0.38) | 0.16 (−0.04, 0.35) |
| Regularized (ref. undocumented) (within-individual effect) | 0.06 (−0.16, 0.28) | 0.02 (−0.21, 0.24) |
| Applicant (ref. undocumented) (between-individual effect) | 0.32 (0.07, 0.57)* | 0.21 (−0.04, 0.46) |
| Regularized (ref. undocumented) (between-individual effect) | 0.46 (0.26, 0.67)*** | 0.34 (0.13, 0.55)** |
| Wave 1 (ref. Wave 3) | −0.06 (−0.19, 0.01) | −0.08 (−0.20, 0.04) |
| Wave 2 (ref. Wave 3) | 0.04 (−0.07, 0.15) | 0.02 (−0.09, 0.12) |
| Wave 4 (ref. Wave 3) | 0.01 (−0.11, 0.12) | −0.00 (−0.12, 0.11) |
| Women (ref. Men) | 0.11 (−0.06, 0.28) | |
| Age at baseline | 0.00 (−0.01, 0.01) | |
| African (ref. Latino American) | −0.24 (−0.54, 0.07) | |
| East Asian (ref. Latino American) | 0.08 (−0.09, 0.25) | |
| Eastern European (ref. Latino American) | 0.22 (−0.09, 0.53) | |
| Secondary education (ref. Primary education) | 0.32 (0.08, 0.57)* | |
| Tertiary education (ref. Primary education) | 0.22 (−0.06, 0.49) | |
| Length of stay at baseline | −0.00 (−0.02, 0.02) | |
| Ability to face an unexpected bill (ref. No) | 0.2 (0.10, 0.31)*** | |
| Number of working hours | 0.003 (0.000, 0.01)* | |
| Satisfaction with housing conditions (scale from 0 to 10) | 0.03 (0.01, 0.05)** | |
| Poor (very bad to sufficient) proficiency in French (ref. Good to Excellent) | −0.03 (−0.28, 0.02) | |
| Partnership status (single) (ref. Married) | −0.13 (−0.28, 0.20) | |
| Partnership status (unmarried couple) (ref. Married) | −0.07 (−0.22, 0.09) | |
| Nb. Children |
−0.03 (−0.08, 0.02) |
|
| Observations (n, N) | 387, 1304 | 387, 1304 |
| R2 interindividual | 0.06 | 0.2 |
| R2 residual | 0.00 | 0.00 |
***p < 0.001; **p < 0.01; *p < 0.05, Data source: Parchemins study.