Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 26;30:29. doi: 10.1186/s12929-023-00919-1

Table 2.

Comparison of the properties of antibiotic, phage, and endolysin as antibacterial therapeutic agents

Properties Antibiotic Phage Endolysin References
Bacteriocidal specificity Broad spectrum more common than narrow spectrum Typically narrow, species or strain specificity Relatively broad lytic activity [82, 83]
Proliferation Non-proliferation Self-proliferation Non-proliferation [11, 84]
Mode of action Applied from without, target specific sites, typically disrupts one bacterial process Applied from without, disrupt many essential cellular processes Applied from without, target bonds in the peptidoglycan [83, 85]
Bacteriocidal speed Short time between administration and eradication of bacteria Long time between administration and eradication of bacteria Rapid bacterial activity within seconds of contact [14, 86]
Intracellular activity Diffusion through membranes allows for treatment of intracellular bacteria Unable to penetrate eukaryotic cells Few or modified ones (e.g., CPP-fused endolysins) can enhance intracellular efficacy [77, 86, 87]
Resistance development Prone to develop resistance Resistance occurs quite frequently No resistance has ever been reported over number of treated generations [88, 89]
Antibiofilm activity Not very effective against biofilms Effective antibiofilm agents with limited penetration Relatively effective antibiofilm agents with higher destruction of biofilms [13, 83]
Immune response Generally non-immunogenic Interaction with immune systems and susceptible to clearance by antibodies Immunogenic, lower degree of antibody neutralization [26, 51, 90]
Pharmacokinetics Establish the relationship between concentration and the magnitude of killing activity Little clinical evidence that defines optimal dosages and pharmacokinetic parameters of therapy Defined concentration at site of infection and in blood circulation [29, 88, 89]

CPP cell-penetrating peptide