A. Set-up for dual color (465 nm/405 nm) fiber photometry recordings of
GRAB5-HT expressed in dLGN. Recordings at 405 nm were used to
correct for motion artifact (Fig. S5A).
B. Example traces of GRAB5-HT ΔF/F and pupil area.
Gray bars: stationary periods.
C. Correlation between pupil area and GRAB5-HT ΔF/F
in stationary periods (Pearson’s correlation coefficient and
R2 of linear regression).
D. Changes in GRAB5-HT fluorescence related to fluoxetine
(Fig. S1D),
optostim (Fig. 1B-C), standard deviation of spontaneous fluctuations
(panel B and Fig. S1E),
arousal (ΔF/Fhigh - ΔF/Flow), tail shock
(Fig. S5C), and
Ensure (Fig. S5B). n =
4 mice (optostim) or 3 mice (all others). Inset: expanded y axis scale.
E. Mean responses of same example boutons as in Fig. 4D, averaged separately for control trials with
high arousal (magenta; pupil >50% of maximum) and low arousal (green;
pupil <50% of maximum). Mean +/− SEM across trials. Orange bars:
time points at which the difference between the high arousal (Rhigh)
and low arousal (Rlow) trials is calculated.
F. Cumulative distributions of Rhigh - Rlow, for
time points when each bouton’s activity was between .5-.7 of its dynamic
range. LME: all distributions except SBC were significantly suppressed, p
< .001; FF vs. Bar, FF vs. FF+Bar, SBC vs. Bar, SBC vs. FF+Bar,
p<.001, SBC vs. FF p<.05. FF: 885, FF+bar: 805, Bar: 2051, SBC:
313 boutons (8 FOV, 5 mice).
G. Scatterplot of suppression by optostim vs. by arousal. Suppression
by arousal and optostim showed only a weak negative correlation (r =
−0.047, p < 0.001; consistent with Fig. 5C). Dots: RGC boutons, colored by category. Top and
right: distributions per category.
H. Mean suppression by arousal in FF and Bar boutons (compare to Fig. 4G). Bars: means across mice; lines:
means per mouse (n=5). *p<0.05, two-tailed paired t-test.
See also Figure
S5.