Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 26;20(1):53–64. doi: 10.1007/s10393-023-01628-9

Table 1.

Characteristics of selected households and percentages of households in which at least one household member had exposures to wild animals (rodents, bats or monkeys) in the past month in Bangladesh, 2013 to 2016 (N = 10,002).

Household characteristics, practices and exposure to wild animals Overall percentage (95% CI) Rural
N = 8294
percentage (95% CI)
Urban
N = 1708
percentage (95% CI)
Differences (rural vs. urban)
percentage
(p-value)
Having domestic animals in the household 54 (53–55) 61 (60–62) 21 (19–23) 40 (< 0.001)
Having any fruit tree near the boundary of the household 95 (94–95) 98 (97.8–98.4) 78 (76–80) 20 (< 0.001)
Any of the household members having consumed dropped fruit 33 (32–34) 37 (35–38) 17 (15–19) 20 (< 0.001)
Any of the household members having eaten fruit previously bitten by an animal 13 (12–14) 15 (14–15) 5 (4–6) 10 (< 0.001)
Any of the household members having drank fresh/raw date palm sap (throughout the study period) 3.71(3.4–4.1) 3.96 (3.5–4.4) 2.5 (1.8–3.2) 1.46 (0.055)
Used a method of rodent control in your house or property 20 (19–21) 21 (20–21) 18 (16–19) 3 (0.013)
Any household member had physical contact with rodents and/or observed rodents in the household 90 (89–91) 92 (91–92) 84 (82–86) 8 (< 0.001)
 Rodents were observed in the household 90 (90–91) 92 (91–92) 84 (82–86) 8 (< 0.001)
 Rodents were touched by household members 8.53 (8.0–9.1) 8.61 (8.0–9.2) 8.14 (6.8–9.4) 0.005 (0.537)
Any household member had physical contact with bats, including hunting or consuming 0.5 (0.4–7) 0.6(0.4–0.7) 0.35 (0.1–0.7) 0.25 (0.285)
Any household member touched, bitten or scratched by a monkey 0.05 (0.02–0.13) 0.05 (0.01–0.1) 0.06 (0.056–0.17)  − 0.01 (0.876)