Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 5;25:e43342. doi: 10.2196/43342

Table 2.

Model fit statistics (1).

Models LLa BICb (LL) AICc (LL) AIC3 (LL) Npard e df e P valuef
1-cluster −3470.26 7010.65 6962.51 6973.51 11.00 6940.51 577.00 <.001
2-cluster −3261.06 7076.90 6696.12 6783.12 87.00 6522.12 501.00 <.001
3-cluster −3066.08 7171.57 6458.16 6621.16 163.00 6132.16 425.00 <.001
4-cluster −2954.16 7432.35 6386.31 6625.31 239.00 5908.31 349.00 <.001
5-cluster −2866.60 7741.86 6363.19 6678.19 315.00 5733.19 273.00 <.001
6-cluster −2747.72 7988.73 6277.43 6668.43 391.00 5495.43 197.00 <.001
7-cluster −2690.39 8358.71 6314.78 6781.78 467.00 5380.78 121.00 <.001

aLL: log-likelihood (the smaller the absolute value of log-likelihood, the better the model fit).

bBIC: Bayesian information criterion (values closer to 0 indicate better fit).

cAIC: Akaike information criterion (values closer to 0 indicate better fit).

dNpar: number of estimated parameters.

eL2, df: the sample sizeadjusted BIC (SABIC) based on the L2 and df, which is the more common formulation in the analysis of frequency tables. They are defined as:

fAll P values <.01.