Table 3.
Indirect effects of multiple parallel mediation model.
| Indirect Effect | Standard Error | 95% CI | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total | .515 | .217 | [.147, .1.013] |
| DERS – NONACCEPT | .127 | .119 | [-.097, .378] |
| DERS – GOALS | -.072 | .185 | [-.423, .307] |
| DERS – IMPULSE | .009 | .130 | [-.287, .251] |
| DERS – AWARENESS | .011 | .042 | [-.060, .117] |
| DERS – STRATEGIES | .465 | .204 | [.127, .910] |
| DERS – CLARITY | -.006 | .163 | [-.326, .337] |
Note. Significant effects (i.e. 95% CI not included 0) are bolded. DERS = Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale total score. DERS – NONACCEPT = DERS Nonacceptance of Emotion subscale score. DERS – GOALS = DERS Inability to Engage in Goal-Directed Behavior When Distressed subscale score. DERS – IMPULSE = DERS Impulse Control Difficulties subscale score. DERS – AWARENESS = DERS Lack of Emotional Awareness subscale score. DERS – STRATEGIES = DERS Lack of Effective Emotion Regulation Strategies subscale score. DERS – CLARITY = DERS Lack of Emotional Clarity subscale score.