Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 26;14:49. doi: 10.1007/s12672-023-00660-z

Table 7.

Prognostic factors analysis in TNBC

Factors N Events (%) Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
X2 P-value HR (95% CI) P-value
All patients 208 27(13.0)
Age 0.007 0.933
  < 50 94 12(12.8)
  ≥ 50 114 15(13.2)
Menstrual status 0.004 0.949
 Premenopausal 99 13(13.1)
 Postmenopausal 109 14(12.8)
T stage 5.632 0.017
 T1, T2 148 14(9.5) ref
 T3, T4 60 13(21.7) 2.097(0.628–5.890) 0.066
N stage 4.345 0.037
 N0 76 5(6.6) ref
 N +  132 22(16.7) 3.633(1.819–8.687) 0.032
Histological type 0.054 0.816
 IDC 166 22(13.3)
 Others 42 5(11.9)
Histological grade 5.253 0.022
 I, II 112 9(8.0) ref
 III 96 18(18.8) 1.202(0.816–2.651) 0.059
ki67 index 1.824 0.177
  < 14% 17 4(23.5)
  ≥ 14% 191 23(12.0)
P53 status 0.328 0.567
 Negative 82 12(14.6)
 Positive 126 15(11.9)
HER2 status 3.807 0.051
 0 expression 98 8(8.2)
 Low expression 110 19(17.3)
AR status 14.083  < 0.001
 Negative 136 9(6.6) ref
 Positive 72 18(25.0) 4.551(2.668–8.063) 0.015
EGFR status 2.126 0.145
 Negative 141 15(10.6)
 Positive 67 12(17.9)
CK5/6 status 0.049 0.825
 Negative 180 23(12.8)
 Positive 28 4(14.3)
Surgery 0.002 0.964
 Conservative 47 6(12.8)
 Mastectomy 161 21(13.0)
Radiotherapy 0.162 0.687
 Yes 153 19(12.4)
 No 55 8(14.5)
NAC effect 3.897 0.048
 pCR 46 2(4.3) ref
 non-pCR 162 25(15.4) 3.825(1.864–5.991) 0.029

IDC invasive ductal carcinoma, NAC neoadjuvant chemotherapy