TABLE 3.
Nucleotide BLAST (nBLAST) results from the Fusarium MLST and FUSARIUM-ID databases for the FSAMSC.
| PPRI no. | Fusarium MLST | FUSARIUM-ID | Fusarium MLST similarity% | FUSARIUM-ID similarity% | Isolation site | Particle size | Accession number |
| 26243 | FSAMSC | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782346 |
| 26246 | FSAMSC | F. brachygibbosum | 93% | 93% | Site 2 | Small | OL782338 |
| 26275 | Fusarium sp. | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782342 |
| 26278 | F. transvaalense | F. brachygibbosum | 94% | 93% | Site 2 | Large | OL782335 |
| 26284 | FSAMSC | F. brachygibbosum | 94% | 93% | Site 2 | Small | OL782352 |
| 26285 | FSAMSC | F. sporotrichioides | 93% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782353 |
| 26310 | FSAMSC | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782347 |
| 26311 | FSAMSC | F. brachygibbosum | 93% | 93% | Site 2 | Small | OL782340 |
| 26319 | Fusarium sp. | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782344 |
| 26330 | F. transvaalense | F. brachygibbosum | 94% | 93% | Site 2 | Small | OL782348 |
| 26340 | FSAMSC | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782349 |
| 26771 | F. transvaalense | F. brachygibbosum | 94% | 93% | Site 2 | Large | OL782334 |
| 26782 | FSAMSC | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782345 |
| 26789 | Fusarium sp. | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782341 |
| 26792 | F. transvaalense | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782351 |
| 26795 | Fusarium sp. | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782343 |
| 27128 | F. transvaalense | F. brachygibbosum | 94% | 93% | Site 2 | Small | OL782337 |
| 27145 | Fusarium sp. | F. brachygibbosum | 94% | 93% | Site 2 | Small | OL782336 |
| 27322 | F. transvaalense | F. sporotrichioides | 94% | 91% | Site 2 | Small | OL782350 |
| 27326 | FSAMSC | F. brachygibbosum | 93% | 93% | Site 2 | Small | OL782339 |
| 27530 | FSAMSC | F. brachygibbosum | 94% | 94% | Site 1 | Large | OL782354 |
Marked in bold are the isolates that produced contrasting nBLAST™ results between the two databases. All similarity percentages were below 97%.