Table S2.
Gender related differences in in questionnaire responses.
| Gender related differences | N | Female, N = 133 | Male, N = 247 | p-value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age | 380 | <0.001 | ||
| < 39 years | 43 (32%) | 32 (13%) | ||
| 40-49 years | 27 (20%) | 35 (14%) | ||
| 50-59 years | 38 (29%) | 49 (20%) | ||
| => 60 years | 25 (19%) | 131 (53%) | ||
| OP activity | 380 | 0.006 | ||
| No | 24 (18%) | 20 (8.1%) | ||
| Yes | 109 (82%) | 227 (92%) | ||
| In how many companies are you currently appointed as OP? | 332 | 0.003 | ||
| < 10 enterprises | 62 (57%) | 83 (37%) | ||
| 10-25 enterprises | 14 (13%) | 39 (17%) | ||
| 26-50 enterprises | 7 (6.5%) | 36 (16%) | ||
| > 50 enterprises | 25 (23%) | 66 (29%) | ||
| Following the enactment of Legislative Decree 81/2008 and subsequent amendments, occupational HP programs have increased | 335 | 0.218 | ||
| Do not agree at all | 7 (6.4%) | 18 (8.0%) | ||
| Disagree | 21 (19%) | 68 (30%) | ||
| Quite agree | 59 (54%) | 104 (46%) | ||
| Very much agree | 16 (15%) | 23 (10%) | ||
| Totally agree | 6 (5.5%) | 13 (5.8%) | ||
| Occupational HP programs should be understood as an integral part of a system for protecting workers’ health and psycho-physical integrity | 336 | 0.887 | ||
| Do not agree at all | 0 (0%) | 2 (0.9%) | ||
| Disagree | 2 (1.8%) | 6 (2.6%) | ||
| Quite agree | 19 (17%) | 47 (21%) | ||
| Very much agree | 46 (42%) | 91 (40%) | ||
| Totally agree | 42 (39%) | 81 (36%) | ||
| Occupational HP programs should be supported by collaboration with other health professionals (general practitioners, specialists in other disciplines) | 336 | 0.200 | ||
| Do not agree at all | 0 (0%) | 3 (1.3%) | ||
| Disagree | 1 (0.9%) | 6 (2.6%) | ||
| Quite agree | 23 (21%) | 69 (30%) | ||
| Very much agree | 50 (46%) | 86 (38%) | ||
| Totally agree | 35 (32%) | 63 (28%) | ||
| Based on your work experience, generally, the interest of employers in implementing health promotion programs is: | 335 | 0.026 | ||
| Insufficient | 6 (5.6%) | 21 (9.3%) | ||
| Poor | 27 (25%) | 86 (38%) | ||
| Sufficient | 44 (41%) | 64 (28%) | ||
| Good | 25 (23%) | 51 (22%) | ||
| High | 6 (5.6%) | 5 (2.2%) | ||
| In the last 5 years, during your work as OP, have you had the opportunity to organize health promotion interventions? | 335 | 0.159 | ||
| No | 53 (49%) | 90 (40%) | ||
| Yes | 56 (51%) | 136 (60%) | ||
| In the last 5 years, while carrying out the activity of OP, have you had the opportunity to collaborate in health promotion interventions? | 334 | 0.054 | ||
| No | 58 (53%) | 93 (41%) | ||
| Yes | 51 (47%) | 132 (59%) | ||
| How do you evaluate the workers’ participation in such voluntary interventions? | 274 | 0.671 | ||
| Insufficient | 3 (3.5%) | 3 (1.6%) | ||
| Poor | 10 (12%) | 30 (16%) | ||
| Sufficient | 31 (36%) | 71 (38%) | ||
| Good | 33 (39%) | 72 (38%) | ||
| High | 8 (9.4%) | 13 (6.9%) | ||
| How do you evaluate the effectiveness of the HP interventions adopted? | 267 | 0.634 | ||
| Not very effective | 12 (15%) | 34 (18%) | ||
| Quite effective | 57 (71%) | 118 (63%) | ||
| Very effective | 9 (11%) | 30 (16%) | ||
| Completely effective | 2 (2.5%) | 5 (2.7%) | ||
| Have effectiveness indicators been adopted (e.g. Key Performance Indicators – KPI)? | 271 | 0.439 | ||
| No | 52 (64%) | 129 (68%) | ||
| I don’t know | 16 (20%) | 26 (14%) | ||
| Yes | 13 (16%) | 35 (18%) |
HP, health promotion; OP, occupational physician.