Table S6.
Analyses of the differences with respect to have been collaborating in HP interventions.
| N | No, N = 143 | Sì, N = 192 | p-value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | 334 | 0.041 | ||
| Female | 58 (38%) | 51 (28%) | ||
| Male | 93 (62%) | 132 (72%) | ||
| Age | 334 | 0.562 | ||
| < 39 years | 17 (11%) | 24 (13%) | ||
| 40-49 years | 26 (17%) | 33 (18%) | ||
| 50-59 years | 34 (23%) | 50 (27%) | ||
| => 60 years | 74 (49%) | 76 (42%) | ||
| OP activity | 334 | |||
| Yes | 151 (100%) | 183 (100%) | ||
| In how many companies are you currently appointed as OP? | 330 | 0.078 | ||
| ≤ 25 enterprises | 81 (55%) | 117 (64%) | ||
| >25 enterprises | 67 (45%) | 65 (36%) | ||
| Number of employees in the enterprises where the OPs performed their professional activity | 327 | <0.001 | ||
| ≤ 49 employees | 65 (44%) | 118 (66%) | ||
| >49 employees | 83 (56%) | 61 (34%) | ||
| Number of followed workers per OP | 326 | <0.001 | ||
| ≤500 | 53 (36%) | 25 (14%) | ||
| > 500 | 94 (64%) | 154 (86%) | ||
| Following the enactment of Legislative Decree 81/2008 and subsequent amendments, occupational HP programs have increased | 333 | 0.453 | ||
| Do not agree at all | 13 (8.6%) | 12 (6.6%) | ||
| Disagree | 42 (28%) | 46 (25%) | ||
| Quite agree | 76 (50%) | 86 (47%) | ||
| Very much agree | 14 (9.3%) | 25 (14%) | ||
| Totally agree | 6 (4.0%) | 13 (7.1%) | ||
| Occupational HP programs should be understood as an integral part of a system for protecting workers’ health and psycho-physical integrity | 334 | 0.114 | ||
| Do not agree at all | 1 (0.7%) | 1 (0.5%) | ||
| Disagree | 4 (2.6%) | 4 (2.2%) | ||
| Quite agree | 38 (25%) | 27 (15%) | ||
| Very much agree | 60 (40%) | 76 (42%) | ||
| Totally agree | 48 (32%) | 75 (41%) | ||
| Occupational HP programs should be supported by collaboration with other health professionals (general practitioners, specialists in other disciplines) | 334 | 0.190 | ||
| Do not agree at all | 0 (0%) | 3 (1.6%) | ||
| Disagree | 3 (2.0%) | 4 (2.2%) | ||
| Quite agree | 47 (31%) | 43 (23%) | ||
| Very much agree | 54 (36%) | 82 (45%) | ||
| Totally agree | 47 (31%) | 51 (28%) | ||
| Based on your work experience, generally, the interest of employers in implementing HP programs is: | 333 | 0.058 | ||
| Insufficient | 18 (12%) | 9 (4.9%) | ||
| Poor | 49 (33%) | 63 (34%) | ||
| Sufficient | 52 (35%) | 55 (30%) | ||
| Good | 28 (19%) | 48 (26%) | ||
| High | 3 (2.0%) | 8 (4.4%) | ||
| In the last 5 years, during your work as OP, have you had the opportunity to organize HP interventions? | 333 | <0.001 | ||
| No | 114 (75%) | 28 (15%) | ||
| Yes | 37 (25%) | 154 (85%) | ||
| How do you evaluate the workers’ participation in such voluntary interventions? | 273 | <0.001 | ||
| Insufficient | 5 (5.6%) | 1 (0.5%) | ||
| Poor | 21 (23%) | 19 (10%) | ||
| Sufficient | 36 (40%) | 65 (36%) | ||
| Good | 24 (27%) | 81 (44%) | ||
| High | 4 (4.4%) | 17 (9.3%) | ||
| How do you evaluate the effectiveness of the HP interventions adopted? | 266 | 0.002 | ||
| Not very effective | 25 (28%) | 21 (12%) | ||
| Quite effective | 55 (62%) | 119 (67%) | ||
| Very effective | 7 (8.0%) | 32 (18%) | ||
| Completely effective | 1 (1.1%) | 6 (3.4%) | ||
| Have effectiveness indicators been adopted (e.g. Key Performance Indicators – KPI)? | 270 | 0.011 | ||
| No | 67 (75%) | 113 (62%) | ||
| I don’t know | 15 (17%) | 27 (15%) | ||
| Yes | 7 (7.9%) | 41 (23%) |
HP, health promotion; OP, occupational physician.