Skip to main content
. 2023 Jan 25;4(4):225–231. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2023.01.004

Table 2.

Comparison of patients with PICM pre- and postupgrade to CRT

Preupgrade Postupgrade P Value
Full cohort (N = 43)
Paced QRS, ms 186.1 ± 23.3 158.1 ± 25.9 .022
Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, cm 5.9 ± 0.9 5.4 ± 0.9 .003
Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 28.7 ± 8.4 44.3 ± 9.4 <.001
NYHA functional class 2.4 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.5 <.001
Severe PICM (n = 37)
Paced QRS, ms 186.3 ± 21.2 163.5 ±19.2 <.001
Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, cm 6.2 ± 0.8 5.6 ± 0.9 .006
Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 26.4 ± 6.5 42.6 ± 9.2 <.001
NYHA functional class 2.4 ± 0.5 1.3 ± 0.5 <.001
Mild-to-moderate PICM (n = 6)
Paced QRS, ms 176.0 ± 36.1 139.8 ± 43.7 .031
Left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, cm 4.7 ± 0.5 4.7 ± 0.5 .946
Left ventricular ejection fraction, % 43.3 ± 2.6 55.8 ± 2.04 <.001
NYHA functional class 2.3 ± 0.6 1.3 ± 0.6 .051

Values are mean ± SD.

NYHA = New York Heart Association; PICM = pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.