Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 27.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2019 Dec 18;73:46–54. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2019.12.014

Table 2.

ANOVA test of the null hypotheses that the surgical cut parameters do not influence the maximum ROF value, and the volume of failed elements. The ANOVA F-value (F), p-value (p) and significance (Sig) results (*=p<0.05, **=p<0.01, ***=p<0.001, NS=p>0.5) are shown.

Parameter Maximum ROF value Volume of failed elements
F p Sig F p Sig
a (resection depth, mm) 183.4 2.2e-16 *** 1295.5 2.2e-16 ***
c (vertical cut anterior, mm) 0.1 0.028 * 0.04 0.843 NS
d (horizontal cut anterior, mm) 21.2 0.709 NS 21.3 4.3e-06 ***
e (vertical cut posterior, mm) 4.9 2.2e-16 *** 2859.7 2.2e-16 ***
f (horizontal cut posterior, mm) 628.8 4.8e-06 *** 315.4 2.2e-16 ***
g (pin depth, mm) 0.8 0.365 NS 0.3 0.565 NS