Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 4;10(4):686. doi: 10.3390/children10040686

Table 2.

Radiographic evaluation of implant positioning/characteristics.

Parameter Group 1
No Complications
Group 2
Complications
p-Value
Plate position in relation to the physis 0.049
centered 28 (77.7%) 14 (77.8%)
epiphyseal 6 (16.7%) 0 (0.0%)
metaphyseal 2 (5.6%) 4 (22.2%)
Plate position in relation to the shaft axis of femur/tibia (°) 2.1 (11.2) 5.9 (13.5) 0.31
Plate position in relation to the center of the shaft axis of femur/tibia 0.39
centered 18 (50.0%) 10 (71.4%)
posterior 12 (33.3%) 2 (14.3%)
anterior 6 (16.7%) 2 (14.3%)
Angulation of the two screws (°) 0.9 (5.3) 2.8 (6.3) 0.26
Epiphyseal width/diameter (cm) 8.2 (1.0) 8.4 (0.9) 0.44
Length of the screw (cm) 2.7 (0.4) 2.8 (0.4) 0.60
Ratio screw length/epiphyseal width 0.34 (0.03) 0.33 (0.03) 0.80

Parametric data: mean with standard deviation in parenthesis. Positive values of plate position in relation to the shaft axis of femur/tibia mean plate insertion in flexion, negative values mean plate insertion in extension. Positive values of angulation of the screws mean divergent screws, negative values mean convergent screws.