Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 19;30(4):4246–4256. doi: 10.3390/curroncol30040323

Table 2.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy evidence in mCRPC.

Trail Name/NCT Phase Patient Population Treatment Primary Endpoint Results
IMbassador250 (NCT03016312) III mCRPC patients who had progressed on abiraterone Atezolizumab + enzalutamide vs. enzalutamide alone OS Stopped early due to low probability of trial achieving primary endpoint given risk of immune-mediated adverse events
KEYNOTE-641 (NCT03834493) III Chemo-naïve mCRPC patients who are abiraterone-naïve or are intolerant to or progressed on abiraterone Pembrolizumab + enzalutamide vs. placebo + enzalutamide OS, rPFS Discontinued after an interim analysis showed no improvement in rPFS or OS
CheckMate 9KD (NCT03338790) II Chemo-naïve mCRPC patients with ongoing ADT and ≤2 prior novel hormonal therapies Nivolumab and docetaxel with prednisone and then nivolumab ORR, PSA response rate Confirmed ORR (95% CI) was 40.0% (25.7–55.7), and the confirmed PSA50-RR (95% CI) was 46.9% (35.7–58.3)
CheckMate 7DX (NCT04100018) III Chemo-naïve mCRPC patients with ongoing ADT and ≤2 prior novel hormonal therapies Nivolumab + docetaxel vs. placebo + docetaxel rPFS, OS Pending
KEYNOTE-365 (NCT02861573) Cohort B 1b/II Chemo-naïve mCRPC patients who progressed on 4 weeks or more of abiraterone or enzalutamide Pembrolizumab + docetaxel + prednisone Safety, PSA response rate, ORR Confirmed PSA response rate was 34% and the confirmed ORR was 23%. TRAEs occurred in 100 patients (96%). Grade 3–5 TRAEs occurred in 46 patients (44%). Seven AE-related deaths (6.7%) occurred (2 due to treatment-related pneumonitis)
KEYNOTE-921 (NCT03834506) III Chemo-naïve mCRPC patients who progressed on 4 weeks or more of abiraterone or enzalutamide Pembrolizumab + docetaxel vs.
docetaxel alone
OS, rPFS Results presented at ASCO GU 2023 Conference: rPFS (median 8.6 mo with pembrolizumab + docetaxel vs. 8.3 mo with placebo + docetaxel; HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.7121.01; p = 0.0335) and OS (median 19.6 months vs. 19.0 months; HR 0.92, 95% CI 0.7821.09; p = 0.1677) were not met
CheckMate 650 (NCT02985957) II Asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic patients who progressed after 2nd-generation hormone therapy and have not received chemotherapy for mCRPC (cohort 1) and patients who progressed after taxane-based chemotherapy (cohort 2) Ipilimumab + nivolumab ORR; rPFS Median rPFS (95% CI) in all treated patients was 5.5 (3.5–7.1) and 3.8 months (2.1–5.1) in cohorts 1 and 2. In patients with TMB above vs. below the median, the ORR was 50.0% (95% CI 26.0–74.0) vs. 5.3% (95% CI 0.1–26.0)
CheckMate 650 (NCT02985957) additional results II mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel Nivolumab + ipilimumab q3weeks for 4 doses then nivolumab q4weeks (cohort 1) vs. nivolumab q3weeks for 8 doses and ipilimumab q6w for 4 doses then nivolumab q4weeks (cohort 2) vs. ipilimumab alone (cohort 3) vs. cabaziaxel (cohort 4) ORR, PSA response rate, rPFS ORR 9% (cohort 1) vs. 15% (cohort 2) vs. 4% (cohort 3) vs. 11% (cohort 4). PSA response rate 14% (cohort 1) vs. 18% (cohort 2) vs. 5% (cohort 3) vs. 24% (cohort 4)

Abbreviations: ADT androgen deprivation therapy; CI confidence interval; HR hazard ratio; mCRPC metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; ORR objective response rate; OS overall survival; PD-L1 programmed death-1 ligand 1; PSA prostate-specific antigen; rPFS radiographic progression-free survival; RR response rate; TMB tumor mutational burden; TRAEs treatment-related adverse events.