Table 3.
(A) TACE | |||||
Author (Year) | Study Type and Time Period | Patient Population | Technique | Outcomes | Complications |
Single Cohorts | |||||
Luo (2020) [49] | Prospective Study 11/2015–11/2016 |
N = 37 Mean 62.9 y/o Primary ICC Tumor size 3–8.3 cm |
DEB-TACE | Mean OS = 376 days CR = 8.1% PR = 59.5% |
Major = 0% |
Zhou (2020) [52] | Retrospective Study 11/2015–05/2018 |
N = 88 Unresectable ICC Included tumors > 5 cm |
DEB-TACE | Median OS = 9.0 mo Median PFS = 3.0 mo |
Major = 0% |
Schicho (2017) [55] | Prospective Study 01/2010–06/2014 |
N = 7 Mean = 73.7 y/o Unresectable ICC |
DSM-TACE | OR = 12% DC = 44% DP = 4% |
Major = 4% |
Kim (2008) [56] | Retrospective Study 02/1997–05/2007 |
N = 49 Mean 62.9 y/o Unresectable ICC Tumor size 1.5–16 cm |
TACE and TACI | Median OS = 12 mo 1, 2, 3, 4 yr OS: 46%, 38%, 30%, 15% |
Major = 2% |
Comparative Cohorts | |||||
Sun (2022) [53] | Retrospective Cohort Study 01/2016–06/2020 |
DEB-TACE N = 40 cTACE N = 49 Mean 59.6 y/o Unresectable ICC Included tumors > 5 cm |
DEB-TACE vs. cTACE | DEB-TACE OS = median 10 mo cTACE OS = median 6 mo |
DEB-TACE = 12.5% cTACE = 6.1% |
Baydoun (2021) [3] | Case Series 01/2013–01/2019 |
N = 10 Mean 65.3 y/o Primary and recurrent ICC |
TACE + RFA vs. TACE vs. RFA | All groups median OS = 29.5 mo All groups median PFS = 15.5 mo |
TACE = 0% RFA Major = 0% |
Hu (2020) [48] | Retrospective Cohort Study 10/2015–12/2019 |
N = 35 Mean 57.2 y/o Unresectable stage III and IV ICC Included tumors > 5 cm |
Ap + DEB-TACE vs. Ap + cTACE vs. Ap | Ap + DEB-TACE median OS = 19.3 mo Ap + cTACE median OS = 14.0 mo Ap median OS = 6.5 mo |
Ap + DEB-TACE ≈ Ap + cTACE > Ap |
Park (2011) [6] | Retrospective Cohort Study 01/1996–04/2009 |
TACE N = 72 Supportive care N = 83 Mean 64.6 y/o Unresectable ICC Included tumors > 5 cm |
TACE vs. supportive care | Median OS: TACE = 12.2 mo Supportive care = 3.3 mo |
Grade 3 heme AE = 13% Grade 3 non-heme AE = 24% |
Poggi (2009) [57] | Retrospective Cohort Study 12/2005–05/2008 |
ChT + OEM-TACE N = 9 ChT N = 11 Unresectable ICC |
ChT + OEM-TACE vs. ChT | Median OS: ChT + OEM-TACE = 30 mo ChT = 12.7 mo |
Grade 4 complications = 0% |
(B) Adjuvant TACE | |||||
Author (Year) | Study Type and Time Period | Patient Population | Technique | Outcomes | Complications |
Cheng (2021) [58] | Retrospective Cohort Study 12/2002–11/2015 |
SR + TACE N = 68 SR alone N = 155 Mean 51.8 y/o Included tumors > 5 cm |
SR + adjuvant TACE vs. SR alone | SR + TACE vs. SR alone: 1, 3, 5 yr OS = ND 1, 3, 5 yr RR = ND |
|
Li (2015) [59] | Retrospective Cohort Study 01/2008–02/2011 |
SR + TACE N = 122 SR alone N = 431 Mean 54 y/o Included tumors > 5 cm |
SR + adjuvant TACE vs. SR alone | SR + TACE vs. SR alone: 1, 3, 5 yr OS = ND 1, 3, 5 yr RR = ND |
|
Wu (2012) [31] | Retrospective Cohort Study 01/2005–12/2006 |
SR + TACE N = 57 SR alone N = 57 Median 56 y/o Included tumors > 5 cm |
SR + adjuvant TACE vs. SR alone | Poor prognostic factors: 1, 3, 5 yr OS = SR + TACE > SR (p <0.001) Without poor prognostic factors: 1, 3, 5 yr OS = ND |
|
Shen (2011) [60] | Retrospective Cohort Study 07/2002–12/2003 |
SR + TACE N = 53 SR alone N = 72 Included tumors > 5 cm |
SR + adjuvant TACE vs. SR alone | 1, 3, 5 yr OS = SR + TACE > SR (p <0.045) Median OS in patients with early recurrence: SR + TACE = 12 mo SR alone = 5 mo |
Major = 0% |
Abbreviations: AE = adverse effect; Ap = apatinib; ChT = chemotherapy; CR = complete response; cTACE = conventional TACE; DEB-TACE = drug-eluting bead TACE; DC = disease control; DP = disease progression; DSM-TACE = degradable starch microsphere TACE; heme = hematologic; ICC = intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; mo = months; ND = no difference; OEM-TACE = oxaliplatin-eluting microsphere TACE; OR = objective response; OS = overall survival; PFS = progression-free survival; PR = partial response; RFA = radiofrequency ablation; RR = recurrence rate; SR = surgical resection; TACE = transarterial chemoembolization; TACI = transarterial chemoinfusion; TARE = transarterial radioembolization; yr = year; y/o = years old.