Skip to main content
. 2023 Feb 7;6(1):1–14. doi: 10.26828/cannabis/2023.01.006

Table 1.

Correlations and Descriptive Statistics

MI Male FHAP MEA LI LAA ICT WMT FST PIC PWM PS
(1) MI 1.00
(2) Male -0.06 1.00
(3) FHAP 0.13 0.01 1.00
(4) MEA -0.07 0.00 -0.16 1.00
(5) LI 0.00 -0.06 0.20 -0.44 1.00
(6) LAA 0.24 0.01 -0.08 0.30 -0.43 1.00
(7) ICT -0.06 -0.02 -0.02 0.30 -0.18 0.24 1.00
(8) WMT 0.02 0.02 -0.01 0.28 -0.22 0.32 0.41 1.00
(9) FST -0.12 0.01 -0.06 0.12 -0.12 0.17 0.54 0.26 1.00
(10) PIC 0.27 0.06 0.10 -0.12 0.10 -0.08 -0.27 -0.08 -0.16 1.00
(11) PWM 0.22 -0.04 0.14 -0.08 0.12 -0.05 -0.19 -0.08 -0.15 0.73 1.00
(12) PS 0.24 -0.13 0.12 -0.07 0.11 -0.07 -0.12 -0.12 -0.08 0.60 0.70 1.00
M 0.31 0.46 0.31 14.83 0.53 16.22 3.31 15.55 308.31 13.27 13.71 13.38
SD 0.46 0.50 0.46 2.12 0.50 1.32 0.68 2.28 67.18 2.90 3.18 2.90

Note. Numbers that are significant at p < .05 are in boldface. MI=marijuana initiation; FHAP=family history of alcohol problems; MEA=mother’s educational attainment; LI=low income; LAA=last age assessed; ICT=inhibitory control task; WMT=working memory task; FST= flexible shifting task; PIC=BRIEF-2 poor inhibitory control; PWM=BRIEF-2 poor working memory; PS=BRIEF-2 poor shifting.