Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 13;59:101956. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2023.101956

Table 2.

Risk of bias of the included studies assessed by Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Maximum number of points is nine, and a higher score means the least risk of bias.

Study Selection
Comparability
Outcome
Total
Representativeness of the exposed cohort Selection of the non- exposed cohort Ascertainment of exposure Demonstration that outcome of interest was not present at start of study Comparability of cohorts based on the design or analysis Assessment of outcome Was follow-up long enough for outcomes to occur Adequacy of follow up of cohorts Total (9 max)
Almutawa 2014 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Aoki 2010 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Bjørneboe 2010 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Calloway 2019 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Ekstrand 2006 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Ekstrand 2011a 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Ekstrand 2011b 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Ekstrand 2012 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Fuller 2007a 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Fuller 2007b 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Howard 2020 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 6
Hägglund 2011 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Hägglund 2016 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Kordi 2011 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Kristenson 2013 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Kristenson 2016 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Lanzetti 2017 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7
Meyers 2013 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Meyers 2014 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Rössler 2018 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Soligard 2012 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 9
Steffen 2007 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 7