Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 14;14:100389. doi: 10.1016/j.resplu.2023.100389

Table 2.

ROBINS-I risk of bias assessment for ‘Advanced Life Support’.

Study Year Design Total Patients Population Industry Funding Eligibility Criteria Exposure/Outcome Confounding Follow Up
Lowenstein39 1986 Non-RCT 90 AHA ACLS No Low Low Low Low
Sanders40 1994 Non-RCT 64 AHA ACLS No Highb Low Low Low
Makker41 1995 Non-RCT 225 AHA ACLS No Unclearc Low Highd Low
Camp42 1997 Non-RCT 236 AHA ACLS No Highe Low Highd Low
Pottle43 2000 Non-RCT 299 RC(UK) ALS No Highf Low Highd Low
Dane44 2000 Non-RCT 117 AHA ACLS Partiala Low Low Highd Low
Moretti45 2007 Non-RCT 156 AHA ACLS No Low Low Low Low
Sodhi46 2011 Non-RCT 627 AHA ACLS No Low Low Highd Low
Pareek15 2018 Non-RCT 632 AHA BLS/ACLS No Low Low Highd Low

BLS- Basic Life Support; ACLS- Advanced Cardiac Life Support.

a

Portions of the research were funded by a Teaching Methods Grant from AHA to the first author.

b

Did not elaborate on exclusion criteria for cardiac arrest patients.

c

All incidents analysed but not clear how identified.

d

Prognostic factors not adjusted for in statistical analysis of most studies; considered low if they reported characteristics of patients in one group vs another and described p values.

e

Differing and unclear eligibility criteria for three periods of study.

f

Only those with completed audit form (86.5%) included.