Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 14;4(4):100729. doi: 10.1016/j.patter.2023.100729

Table 4.

Comparison of test performance (and standard deviation) on the BIOSSES and BioASQ tasks with major layer-specific adaptation methods, all with BASE models

Pretraining setting Baseline Laye freeze Layerwise decay Layer reinit
BIOSSES

BERT 93.46 (0.96) 92.86 (0.88) 93.35 (0.78) 94.49∗ (0.88)
BERT (no NSP) 93.12 (1.04) 94.01∗ (0.99) 93.01 (1.07) 92.89 (0.91)
BERT (no NSP, single seq) 75.50 (3.00) 72.09 (2.86) 74.11 (3.51) 85.04∗ (2.69)
ELECTRA 80.24 (5.92) 83.06 (3.68) 83.55 (3.25) 88.74∗ (2.29)

BioASQ

BERT 87.56 (2.43) 90.50∗ (1.51) 88.29 (2.76) 81.28 (3.72)
BERT (no NSP) 83.57 (3.60) 87.07∗ (3.15) 86.07 (2.29) 83.64 (3.70)
BERT (no NSP, single seq) 85.64 (2.48) 88.64∗ (1.76) 88.50 (1.63) 80.79 (2.51)
ELECTRA 88.93 (3.87) 90.00 (4.16) 90.64∗ (2.60) 88.14 (2.21)
∗

Highest performance for model (row).