Table A3.
Parameter estimates of LDS models for observed performance scores.
| Mean Baseline |
Mean Change |
Correlation Baseline-Change | Correlation WMC-Baseline |
Correlation WMC-Change |
||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | iB | p | iΔ | p | ρ1 | p | ρ2 | p | ρ3 | p |
| switch RT (norm) | −1.618 | .000 | .253 | .000 | .200 | .118 | −.262 | .025 | −.449 | .000 |
| switch Error (norm) | −2.417 | .000 | .378 | .000 | −.374 | .077 | −.084 | .536 | −.147 | .569 |
| incon RT (norm) | −1.634 | .000 | .070 | .000 | .250 | .233 | −.292 | .014 | .428 | .042 |
| incon Error (norm) | −2.384 | .000 | 1.076 | .000 | −.545 | .000 | −.068 | .600 | .199 | .241 |
Models: switch = model for task-switch effect; incon = model for response incongruency effect. The observed scores were transformed to normalize their distribution (see Table A2 note). Latent means: iB = mean of the baseline factor; iΔ = mean of the change factor. Latent correlations (ρ1–ρ3) denote standardized relations between factors.