Table 2.
Fit indexes for the proposed 5-factor structure of the Sensory Over-Responsivity Scales in comparison with 1-factor and 2-factor structures. The model fitted with T0a data used data from 1454 individuals. The model fitted with T1b data used data from 485 individuals.
|
|
Chi-square (df) | P valuec | CFId | TLIe | RMSEAf | SRMRg |
| Proposed 5-factor structure (T0) | 1127.2 (160) | <.001 | 0.979 | 0.975 | 0.064 | 0.048 |
| Unidimensional factor structure (T0) | 9891.4 (170) | <.001 | 0.792 | 0.768 | 0.198 | 0.204 |
| 2-factor structure (distress or avoidance and impairment; T0) | 9839.4 (179) | <.001 | 0.793 | 0.767 | 0.198 | 0.203 |
| Proposed 5-factor structure (T1) | 467.6 (160) | <.001 | 0.984 | 0.981 | 0.063 | 0.053 |
| High-order 5-factor model (T0) | 948.3 (165) | <.001 | 0.983 | 0.981 | 0.057 | 0.056 |
| High-order 5-factor model (T1) | 388.3 (165) | <.001 | 0.988 | 0.987 | 0.053 | 0.056 |
aT0: time 0.
bT1: time 1.
cThe t test was 2 tailed.
dCFI: confirmatory fit index.
eTLI: Tucker-Lewis fit index.
fRMSEA: root mean square error of approximation.
gSRMR: standardized root mean square residual.