Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 28;11(2):e2200213. doi: 10.9745/GHSP-D-22-00213

TABLE 3.

Descriptive Factors Enabling Sustained Practice of the Perinatal Problem Identification Program in Western Cape, South Africa

Dimension/Question Main Finding Common Factors Across Sites Distinctions Between Subdistricts
Identification and reporting: How do people identify and report deaths? People identify and report deaths on regular bases because they have a standard reporting system and PPIP regional focal points monitor data inputs.
  • Standard reporting forms available.

  • Standard reporting software/mechanism available (PPIP software).

  • Follow-up by PPIP coordinators at provincial and regional levels to ensure data is collected and submitted.

  • Different reporting forms used after a death.

  • Information officer responsible for PPIP data collection, capturing, and reporting working with doctors and operational manager (C, D, E).

  • PPIP data collection, capturing, and reporting rely on clinicians, the nursing manager, and operational managers (A, B).

Reviewing deaths: How do people review deaths? Review meetings take place regularly as part of national requirements with multidisciplinary engagement, although the meeting process varied between cases.
  • Facilities are required to do a minimum number of review meetings each year (10), and perinatal-focused meetings are counted towards this requirement.

  • Multidisciplinary engagement.

  • Outreach specialist (obstetrician or pediatrician) attends review meeting.

  • Meetings are scheduled monthly (A, B).

  • Ad hoc review meetings (C).

  • Multiple meetings related to review process (D).

  • Facilitation by hospital staff (C, D, E).

  • Outreach specialist facilitates meeting (A, B).

  • Outreach specialist attends and contributes during the meeting (C, D).

Analysis and recommendations: How do people analyze data and make recommendations after perinatal death? Data analysis and use for decision-making varied between cases but all data is used for planning at provincial level.
  • Involvement of managers and clinical specialists (obstetricians, pediatricians, and/or family physicians) in review meeting to analyze cases and identify relevant and feasible recommendations.

  • Regional PPIP focal person conducts analysis of data for the region and makes recommendations to provincial level during biannual meeting.

  • Data analysis by information officer (C, D, E).

  • PPIP data used at M&E subdistrict meeting to make recommendations (C).

  • PPIP data used at the quarterly M&E district meeting for health system planning (C, D, E).

Response and actions: How do people respond to the recommendations and take actions forward after perinatal death? Subdistrict management teams oversee response and actions. Feedback loops for sharing information are in place.
  • Management oversees implementation of actions.

  • Feedback loop in place to share with different teams and levels.

  • No formal follow-up (A, B).

  • Formal follow-up by QA manager (C, D).

  • PPIP data used at the M&E district meeting for health system planning (C, D, E) and M&E subdistrict meeting (C).

Abbreviations: M&E, monitoring and evaluation; PPIP, Perinatal Problem Identification Program; QA, quality assurance.