Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 28;13:6950. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-32180-9

Table 2.

Body plethysmography results of 40 subjects tested without mask (NM) and with three different mask types (SM, CM, FFP2) using the mask adapter.

Measured results Results of GLM model
NM
median
range
SM
median
range
CM
median
range
FFP2
median
range
NM
geometric mean
SM
Δ
p value
CM
Δ
p value
FFP2
Δ
p value
VC (L)

4.67

2.74–7.30

4.67

2.79–7.39

4.74

2.69–7.34

4.66

2.80–7.33

4.62

− 0.1

0.165

− 0.1

0.311

− 0.1

0.274

FVC (L)

4.82

2.76–7.27

4.69

2.65–7.23

4.77

2.67–7.33

4.73

2.83–7.19

4.67

− 0.08

 < 0.001

− 0.09

 < 0.001

− 0.09

 < 0.001

FEV1 (L)

3.84

2.09–5.65

3.76

2.08–5.75

3.72

2.01–5.66

3.69

2.13–5.67

3.73

− 0.07

0.003

− 0.10

 < 0.001

− 0.09

 < 0.001

FEV1/FVC (%)

79.79

65.13–93.24

78.45

65.00–93.24

77.81

62.01–92.82

77.33

63.79–92.72

79.39

− 0.39

0.227

− 0.92

0.005

− 0.90

0.006

PEF (L*s−1)

8.77

4.59–12.75

8.32

4.34–13.21

7.93

4.46–11.65

7.94

4.08–11.52

8.36

− 0.27

0.037

− 0.54

 < 0.001

− 0.63

 < 0.001

MVV (L*min−1)

115

63–170

113

62–173

111

60–170

111

64–170

111.78

− 1.93

0.003

− 2.82

 < 0.001

− 2.61

 < 0.001

Rtot (kPa*s*L−1)

0.15

0.07–0.28

0.19

0.04–0.34

0.21

0.03–0.33

0.28

0.07–0.44

0.14

0.05

 < 0.001

0.06

 < 0.001

0.11

 < 0.001

sRtot (kPa*s)

0.5

0.3–1.4

0.7

0.3–1.7

0.8

0.4–1.5

1.0

0.2–2.2

0.64

− 0.20

 < 0.001

0.28

 < 0.001

0.50

 < 0.001

WOB (kPa*L)

0.21

0.04–0.63

0.25

0.05–0.88

0.26

0.11–1.18

0.27

0.05–0.96

0.20

0.05

0.001

0.08

 < 0.001

0.09

 < 0.001

RP (Watt)

0.07

0.01–0.20

0.07

0.02–0.22

0.09

0.03–0.41

0.08

0.02–0.33

0.06

0.02

0.005

0.03

 < 0.001

0.03

 < 0.001

Ttot (s)

3.27

1.78–4.83

3.28

2.28–5.14

3.40

2.24–5.69

3.47

2.33–6.08

3.24

0.08

0.324

0.03

0.708

0.09

0.297

CM Community mask, Δ Difference to NM, FEV1 Forced expiratory volume in 1 s, FEV1% VCMAX (%) Tiffeneau Index, FFP2 Filtering face piece class 2, FVC Forced vital capacity, MVV Maximum voluntary ventilation (FEV1 *35), NM No mask, RP Respiratory power, Rtot Total airway resistance, SM Surgical mask, sRtot Specific airway resistance, PEF Peak expiratory flow, Ttot Inspiratory and expiratory time, VC Ventilation capacity, WOB Work of breathing, WOBin Inspiratory work of breathing, WOBex Expiratory work of breathing.

Presented are measured results (median, range). Differences (Δ) of NM to SM, CM, and FFP2 were analysed using a generalized linear mixed model (GLM).

Significant values are in bold.