Table 3.
Physical characteristics of fruits during the supplemental lighting ± SEM (n = 30).
| Treatment z | Fruit Weight (g) | Fruit Length (mm) | Fruit Width (mm) | No. of Locules (ea) | Pericarp Thickness (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QD-IL | 194.4 ± 5.4 a y | 90.27 ± 1.55 a | 82.52 ± 1.10 a | 3.61 ± 0.05 a | 6.18 ± 0.11 a |
| CW-IL | 195.4 ± 4.9 a | 94.72 ± 1.73 a | 82.35 ± 0.94 a | 3.49 ± 0.13 a | 6.11 ± 0.10 a |
| B+R-IL | 189.0 ± 5.3 a | 90.81 ± 1.51 a | 80.88 ± 1.07 a | 3.61 ± 0.06 a | 6.34 ± 0.14 a |
| CW-TL | 192.9 ± 6.0 a | 91.22 ± 1.90 a | 83.20 ± 1.07 a | 3.67 ± 0.08 a | 6.05 ± 0.11 a |
| Cont | 197.6 ± 4.8 a | 94.58 ± 1.55 a | 83.23 ± 1.12 a | 3.57 ± 0.07 a | 6.21 ± 0.14 a |
z See Table 1 for details on the treatment included. y Means with different letters within column indicate statistically significant differences by Duncan’s multiple range test at the 5% level.