Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 12;15(4):1225. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics15041225

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Histological images (H&E stain, 100X) of examples of ankle joints of different groups including the control group (a), arthritic group (b), chrysin 50 mg/kg (c), chrysin 100 mg/kg (d), and piroxicam 10 mg/kg groups (e) (n = 10 per group). The control group shows no inflammation. Using the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration as an indicator of effect, the CFA arthritic group shows severe inflammation/extensive inflammatory cell infiltration; while (ce) show an improvement in the extent of inflammatory cell infiltration after treatment with chrysin (50 mg/kg or 100 mg/kg, respectively) or piroxicam in CFA arthritic rats. (a): Inline graphic shows stratified squamous keratinized epithelium. (b): ▲ Shows chronic granulomatous inflammation, Inline graphic Shows pannus formation, Inline graphic Shows peri-articular inflammation. (c): ▲ Showing synovial hyperplasia, Inline graphic Shows articular cartilage with no inflammation. (d): Inline graphic = mild synovial hyperplasia, ▲ = mild peri articular inflammation, Inline graphic = intact articular cartilage. (e): Inline graphic shows mild synovial inflammation and hyperplasia, ▲ shows intact articular cartilage.