Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 7;13(4):966. doi: 10.3390/life13040966

Table 3.

Included studies that provided measurable results.

Ref. Authors Year Type PF (n) Site Stenting
(n)
Stents (n) Stent Healing Stent Complications Mortality
[4] Schweeigert et al. 2014 OS 49 29/49 60% 10.3% (aortic erosion n = 3) 24.1%
[8] Schaheen et al. 2014 R 72%
[9] Wu et al. 2017 OS 27 C 88.9%
[10] Lee et al. 2013 OS 20 A 20/20 95%
[11] Rajan et al. 2014 OS 32 T 32/32 96% 8.54%
[12] Schweigert et al. 2013 OS 38 22/38 77% 13.6% (aortic erosion n = 3) 22.7%
[13] Nguyen et al. 2011 CS 18 9/28 100% 0%
[14] Speer et al. 2016 OS 23 C 22/23 63/22 70% 62% migration, 11% tissue overgrowth, 8% minor erosion, 8% major erosion 0%
[15] Smith et al. 2020 OS 11 10/11 90% 9%
[16] Bohle et al. 2020 OS 34 34/34 76% 15% 20%
[17] El-Sourani et al. 2022 OS 28 7/28 85.7% 28.6% (stent migration n = 1, perforation, n = 1) 0%
[18] D’Cunha et al. 2011 OS 37 37/37 94/37 59% 8.1% (stent erosion, leak enlargement, fatal gastroaortic fistula) 0%
[19] Stephens et al. 2014 OS 89 89/89 74.2% 3.4%
[20] van Boeckel et al. 2011 SR 267 267/267 85% 34% (stent migration 31%, tissue overgrowth 3%)
[21] Singer et al. 2017 OS 21 21/21 19% (stent migration n = 4)
[22] Kucukay et al. 2013 OS 14 14/14 79% 21.4% (recurrent fistula n = 2 stent dislocation n = 1) 0%
[23] Feith et al. 2011 SR 115 115/115 70% Stent dislocation 53% after esophagocolonostomy, 61% with esophagojejunostomy, 49% with esophagogastrostomy.
[24] Aryaie et al. 2017 OS 20 20/20 90% 60% (stent migration n = 8, mucosal friability n = 4, tissue integration n = 2, bleeding n = 2, aortoesophageal fistula n = 2). 5%
[25] Sanz Segura et al. 2022 OS 31 31/31 75% 21.7% (stent migration n = 5), 0%
[26] Haruštiak et al. 2020 OS 80 39/80 62% 10% (airway fistula n = 4) 10%
[27] Eizaguirre et al. 2016 OS 24 13/24 92.3% 7.7%
[28] Kim et al. 2013 OS 33 4/33 50% 0%
[29] Berlth et al. 2018 CS 111 76/111 73.9% 14.5% (perforation n = 1, gastrotracheal fistula n = 4, stenosis n = 5)
[30] Mennigen et al. 2015 CS 45 30/45 63.3% 36.7% 26.7%
[31] Rausa et al. 2018 MA 134 80/134 pooled odds ratio of EVT/stent = 5.51 pooled odds ratio of EVT/stent = 0.38 pooled odds ratio of EVT/stent = 0.33
[32] Tavares et al. 2021 MA 559 65.6%
[33] Hallit et al. 2021 MS 68 30/68 77% 6.7%
[34] Hoeppner et al. 2014 OS 35 35/35 48/35 69% 71% (stent dislocation −19%) 0%
[35] Freeman et al. 2012 CS 46 46/46 67.4%
[36] Freeman et al. 2011 OS 17 17/17 100% 18% (stent migration n = 3) 0%
[37] Al-Issa et al. 2014 OS 20 15/20 67% 33% (stent migration n = 3, tracheoesophageal fistula, n = 2) 6.7%
[38] Southwell et al. 2016 OS 21 21/21 95% 19 % (stent migration n = 4) 0%
[39] van Boeckel et al. 2012 OS 32 32/32 83/52 76% 46% (tissue overgrowth n = 8, stent migration n = 10, ruptured stent cover n = 6, food obstruction n = 3, severe pain n = 2, esophageal rupture n = 2, hemorrhage n = 2) 2%
[40] Iglesias Jorquera et al. 2021 OS 25 25/25 34/25 84% 28% (stent migration n = 7) 0%
[41] Puig C et al. 2014 OS 21 A 21/21 19% 47% (stent migration n = 10)
[42] Fischer et al. 2013 OS 11 11/11 100% 36% (stent dislocation n = 4) 0%
[43] Wei et al. 2013 OS 8 8/8 14/8 9/13 (tissue ingrowth n = 2, stent migration n = 10, esophageal lesion n = 1) 0%
[44] Sharaiha et al. 2015 OS 21 37/37 37% stent migration 0%
[45] Fujii et al. 2013 OS 18 18/18 56% 33% (stent migration n = 7, tracheoesophageal fistula n = 1) 5.6%
[46] Law et al. 2018 MA 75 96.7% 15.9% stent migration
[47] Jena et al. 2023 MA pooled clinical success rate of OTSC fixation = 0.79 pooled rate of migration following OTSC anchorage = 0.08
[48] Licht et al. 2016 OS 49 31/49 88% 3.2% (pulmonary artery erosion n = 1)
[49] Schweigert et al. 2011 OS 25 17/25 76.5% 23.5% (early recurrence n = 1, thoracic aorta erosion n = 3) 17.6%
[50] Lange et al. 2021 OS 3 3/3 100%
[51] Chon et al. 2021 OS 10 15/10 70% 0%
[52] Lange et al. 2023 MS 15 41/15

PF—postoperative fistula, CS—comparative study, MA—meta-analysis, MS—multicentric study, OS—observational study, R—review, SR—systematic review, C—cervical, T—thorax, A—abdominal, EVT—endovacuum therapy, Ref.—reference, n—number.