Table 1.
Compound Name a | Metabolite Identification | p d | Combined Log FC e |
Trend f | Combined VIP g |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Accurate Mass b | Retention Time b | mzCloud Best Match c |
|||||
Phenylacetylglycine | 193.07388 | 6.414 | 90 | 1.52 × 10−33 | 1.822502209 | up | 1.27002 |
7-Methylguanine | 165.06493 | 1.767 | 87.1 | 1.26 × 10−32 | 1.812534031 | up | 1.03212 |
Propionylcarnitine | 217.13116 | 2.578 | 92.9 | 9.31 × 10−32 | −1.80225988 | down | 1.09656 |
Creatine | 131.06937 | 1.489 | 95.2 | 4.95 × 10−30 | 1.780471987 | up | 1.2083 |
L-Ascorbic acid 2-sulfate | 255.98905 | 1.222 | 88 | 4.22 × 10−28 | 1.754421741 | up | 1.07764 |
Methionine | 149.0509 | 1.67 | 91.8 | 3.98 × 10−25 | −1.706198279 | down | 1.27548 |
Ascorbic acid | 176.03203 | 1.226 | 87.4 | 1.54 × 10−23 | 1.676402203 | up | 1.11066 |
N-Isovalerylglycine | 159.08942 | 5.848 | 89.3 | 3.21 × 10−22 | 1.649229414 | up | 1.1655 |
4-Pyridoxic acid | 183.05305 | 3.268 | 94.8 | 1.91 × 10−21 | 1.632156605 | up | 1.16982 |
Xanthurenic acid | 205.03731 | 5.402 | 91.2 | 6.65 × 10−21 | 1.619327608 | up | 1.25248 |
Acetyl-L-carnitine | 203.11558 | 1.659 | 93.8 | 4.74 × 10−20 | −1.599262594 | down | 1.09352 |
Indole-3-lactic acid | 205.07359 | 6.928 | 91.8 | 1.62 × 10−18 | 1.560302287 | up | 1.060518 |
Valine | 117.0788 | 1.619 | 95.8 | 8.78 × 10−15 | −1.443708344 | down | 1.004272 |
3-Phenyllactic acid | 166.06286 | 6.78 | 91.1 | 5.48 × 10−7 | 1.036145258 | up | 1.18646 |
a: The annotation for each compound was based on the HMDB database; b: accurate mass and retention time were obtained from the Q Exactive mass spectrometer on a full-scan model; c: the mass spectrometry data were analyzed by CD 3.1 software (version, Manufacturer name, city, state abbreviation if US or Canada, country) to obtain; d: calculated with student’s t-test. p < 0.05 means that differences in this metabolite between EFI and the controls are significant; e: Combined Log FC: in the biomarker meta-analysis, the mean of fold-change for the metabolite in the experimental group relative to the different control groups is one of the main bases for screening the common differential metabolites; f: trend compared to the control group; g: combined VIP: this value represents the ability of each metabolite to explain estazolam fatal intoxication, and is the mean value of the VIP-value of the experimental group and each control group and auxiliary screening for differential metabolites (the usual screening criterium is VIP > 1).