Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 17;13(4):567. doi: 10.3390/metabo13040567

Table 1.

Differential metabolites for estazolam fatal intoxication in plasma samples.

Compound Name a Metabolite Identification p d Combined
Log FC e
Trend f Combined
VIP g
Accurate Mass b Retention Time b mzCloud
Best Match c
Phenylacetylglycine 193.07388 6.414 90 1.52 × 10−33 1.822502209 up 1.27002
7-Methylguanine 165.06493 1.767 87.1 1.26 × 10−32 1.812534031 up 1.03212
Propionylcarnitine 217.13116 2.578 92.9 9.31 × 10−32 −1.80225988 down 1.09656
Creatine 131.06937 1.489 95.2 4.95 × 10−30 1.780471987 up 1.2083
L-Ascorbic acid 2-sulfate 255.98905 1.222 88 4.22 × 10−28 1.754421741 up 1.07764
Methionine 149.0509 1.67 91.8 3.98 × 10−25 −1.706198279 down 1.27548
Ascorbic acid 176.03203 1.226 87.4 1.54 × 10−23 1.676402203 up 1.11066
N-Isovalerylglycine 159.08942 5.848 89.3 3.21 × 10−22 1.649229414 up 1.1655
4-Pyridoxic acid 183.05305 3.268 94.8 1.91 × 10−21 1.632156605 up 1.16982
Xanthurenic acid 205.03731 5.402 91.2 6.65 × 10−21 1.619327608 up 1.25248
Acetyl-L-carnitine 203.11558 1.659 93.8 4.74 × 10−20 −1.599262594 down 1.09352
Indole-3-lactic acid 205.07359 6.928 91.8 1.62 × 10−18 1.560302287 up 1.060518
Valine 117.0788 1.619 95.8 8.78 × 10−15 −1.443708344 down 1.004272
3-Phenyllactic acid 166.06286 6.78 91.1 5.48 × 10−7 1.036145258 up 1.18646

a: The annotation for each compound was based on the HMDB database; b: accurate mass and retention time were obtained from the Q Exactive mass spectrometer on a full-scan model; c: the mass spectrometry data were analyzed by CD 3.1 software (version, Manufacturer name, city, state abbreviation if US or Canada, country) to obtain; d: calculated with student’s t-test. p < 0.05 means that differences in this metabolite between EFI and the controls are significant; e: Combined Log FC: in the biomarker meta-analysis, the mean of fold-change for the metabolite in the experimental group relative to the different control groups is one of the main bases for screening the common differential metabolites; f: trend compared to the control group; g: combined VIP: this value represents the ability of each metabolite to explain estazolam fatal intoxication, and is the mean value of the VIP-value of the experimental group and each control group and auxiliary screening for differential metabolites (the usual screening criterium is VIP > 1).