Table 3.
Richness and diversity in DR vs. T2DM.
| Study, Year | Chao 1 | ACE | OTUs | Shannon | Simpson | Heip Evenness Index | Beta Diversity PCoA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zhou Z [21], 2021 |
↑ | - | ↑ | Not significant | - | Significantly different | |
| Ye P [18], 2021 | ↓ | - | ↓ | ↓ | ↓ | Significantly different | |
| Huang Y [19], 2021 | Not significant | Not significant | - | Not significant | Not significant | Not significant | Significant diversity |
| Das T [23], 2021 | Not significant | - | Not significant | Not significant | Not significant | - | Significant diversity |
| Moubayed NM [24], 2019 | - | - | Not significant | - | - | - | Significant diversity |
| Li L [25], 2022 | - | - | - | - | - | - | Significant diversity |
| Khan R [26], 2021 | - | - | - | - | - | - | No significant difference in relative abundance; different F/B ratio |
↑: significantly increased (p < 0.05); ↓: significantly decreased (p < 0.05).