Table 1.
Previously reported cases of uterine inversion associated with endometrial carcinoma.
| Case | Age | Image | Approach | Reduction | Management |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kumar (2005) [3] | 51 | MRI | Laparotomy | No | Radical hysterectomy, BSO, PLND |
| Moulding (2004) [4] | 52 | MRI | Laparotomy | No | Total hysterectomy |
| Oguri (2005) [5] | 60 | MRI | Laparotomy | Yes | Total hysterectomy, BSO, PLND |
| Prefontaine M (2012) [6] | 71 | CT | Laparotomy | No | Total hysterectomy, BSO |
| Simms-stewart (2008) [7] | 78 | US (failed) | Laparotomy | Failed | Subtotal hysterectomy |
| Ueda (2006) [8] | 28 | CT | Laparotomy | Failed | Radical hysterectomy, BSO, PLND |
| Current case | 34 | CT | Laparoscopy | Yes | Reduction and delayed surgery (robotically assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy, BSO, sentinel lymph node mapping) |
BSO, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy; CT, computed tomography; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PLND, pelvic lymph node dissection; US, ultrasound.