Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 18;12(8):2938. doi: 10.3390/jcm12082938

Table 4.

Randomized Controlled Trials Evaluating Conduction System Pacing Outcomes.

Study His-SYNC [88] His-Alternative [89] LEVEL-AT [90] LBBP-RESYNC [91]
Year of Publication 2019 2021 2022 2022
Type of CSP HBP HBP HBP, LBBP LBBP
Number of Patients 41 50 70 40
Age 64 ± 13 63.8 ± 9 65.7 ± 9 63.7 ± 11
Mean LVEF (%) 28 30 ± 6 27 ± 7 28.3 ± 5
Follow-up (mon) 6.2 6.0 6.0 6.0
LBBB (%) 85 100 60 100
Baseline QRS Duration (ms) 168 ± 18 165 ± 14 177 ± 21 174.6 ± 14
ICM (%) 65.0 20.0 31.4 0.0
Threshold (V) 1.7 2.4 ± 1.6 1.0 ± 0.4 0.82 ± 0.20
Pulse Width (ms) 1.0 1.0 0.6 ± 0.3 0.5
Procedure Time (min) NR 137 ± 46 125 ± 35 129 ± 32
Complications (%) NR 0 11.4% * NR
Dislodgements (%) 0 0 1 0
Delta QRS duration (ms) −28 −34 −53 ± 20 −43
Delta LVEF (%) +9.1 +16 ± 7 +12.2 ± 9 +5.6
Delta LVESV (mL) NR −53 −37 ± 59 −25
Delta LVAT (ms) NR NR −28 ± 26 79.74 ± 9.94
Other Comments No difference in CV hospitalization or death --- No difference in mortality or HFH BNP favoured LBBP

CSP = conduction system pacing; mon = months; ms = milliseconds; ICM = ischemic cardiomyopathy; V = volts; min = minutes; mL = milliliters; HBP = His bundle pacing; LBBP = left bundle branch pacing; NR = not reported; HFH = heart failure hospitalization; CV = cardiovascular; BNP = brain natriuretic peptide; * Requiring intervention; Mean LVAT.