Table 8.
Model performance analysis.
| Model | Datasets | Precision/% | Recall/% | F1-Sorce/% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ResNet50 | Pu-erh raw tea face | 94.59 | 96.16 | 95.37 |
| Pu-erh ripe tea face | 91.54 | 95.66 | 93.55 | |
| Mixed tea face | 95.46 | 96.41 | 95.93 | |
| VGG16 | Pu-erh raw tea face | 78.37 | 91.83 | 84.57 |
| Pu-erh ripe tea face | 92.84 | 93.00 | 92.92 | |
| Mixed tea face | 92.57 | 92.49 | 92.49 | |
| Inception-Resnet-v1 | Pu-erh raw tea face | 95.65 | 95.50 | 95.57 |
| Pu-erh ripe tea face | 93.92 | 87.66 | 90.68 | |
| Mixed tea face | 92.64 | 96.58 | 94.57 | |
| MobileNet | Pu-erh raw tea face | 94.39 | 92.66 | 93.52 |
| Pu-erh ripe tea face | 96.39 | 93.66 | 95.01 | |
| Mixed tea face | 96.16 | 98.33 | 97.23 | |
| MobileNetV3 | Pu-erh raw tea face | 94.05 | 97.50 | 95.74 |
| Pu-erh ripe tea face | 97.07 | 94.16 | 95.59 | |
| Mixed tea fac | 97.82 | 97.50 | 97.66 | |
| TeaFaceNet | Pu-erh raw tea face | 97.34 | 97.83 | 97.58 |
| Pu-erh ripe tea face | 98.98 | 97.16 | 98.06 | |
| Mixed tea face | 98.82 | 97.58 | 98.20 |
Significant are in value [bold].