Abstract
Diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM) is associated with differential and time‐specific regulation of β‐adrenergic receptors and cardiac cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases with consequences for total cyclic adenosine 3′‐5′ monophosphate (cAMP) levels. We aimed to investigate whether these changes are associated with downstream impairments in cAMP and Ca2+ signalling in a type 1 diabetes (T1D)‐induced DCM model. T1D was induced in adult male rats by streptozotocin (65 mg/kg) injection. DCM was assessed by cardiac structural and molecular remodelling. We delineated sequential changes affecting the exchange protein (Epac1/2), cAMP‐dependent protein kinase A (PKA) and Ca2+/Calmodulin‐dependent kinase II (CaMKII) at 4, 8 and 12 weeks following diabetes, by real‐time quantitative PCR and western blot. Expression of Ca2+ ATPase pump (SERCA2a), phospholamban (PLB) and Troponin I (TnI) was also examined. Early upregulation of Epac1 transcripts was noted in diabetic hearts at Week 4, followed by increases in Epac2 mRNA, but not protein levels, at Week 12. Expression of PKA subunits (RI, RIIα and Cα) remained unchanged regardless of the disease stage, whereas CaMKII increased at Week 12 in DCM. Moreover, PLB transcripts were upregulated in diabetic hearts, whereas SERCA2a and TnI gene expression was unchanged irrespective of the disease evolution. PLB phosphorylation at threonine‐17 was increased in DCM, whereas phosphorylation of both PLB at serine‐16 and TnI at serine‐23/24 was unchanged. We show for the first time differential and time‐specific regulations in cardiac cAMP effectors and Ca2+ handling proteins, data that may prove useful in proposing new therapeutic approaches in T1D‐induced DCM.
Keywords: Ca2+/calmodulin‐dependent kinase II, cAMP‐dependent protein kinase, diabetic cardiomyopathy, exchange protein directly activated by cAMP, excitation–contraction coupling, type 1 diabetes
1. INTRODUCTION
Cyclic adenosine 3′‐5′ monophosphate (cAMP) is a pivotal regulator of cardiac contractility, relaxation and automaticity. The intracellular levels of this second messenger are finely tuned by their rate of synthesis by adenylyl cyclases (AC), and degradation by cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases (PDEs). 1 In normal myocardium, cAMP elevation, particularly through β‐adrenergic receptor (β‐AR) stimulation, exerts inotropic and lusitropic effects by activating cAMP‐dependent protein kinase (PKA). In its inactive form, PKA holoenzyme is a heterotetramer composed of two regulatory (R) and two catalytic (C) subunits. 2 , 3 , 4 Four types of R subunits (RIα, RIβ, RIIα, and RIIβ) and three C subunits (Cα, Cβ, and Cγ) have been described 5 with RIα, RIIα and Cα being the major isoforms expressed in the heart 6 and encoded by distinct genes. Two classes of PKA holoenzymes have been identified (type I and II), which differ in their R subunits (RI and RII) 7 , 8 and cellular localization. 9 Binding of cAMP to PKA‐R subunits causes the dissociation of the tetrameric PKA holoenzyme and thus the release of the free PKA‐C subunits, 10 , 11 hence promoting the phosphorylation and activation of key components of the cardiac excitation–contraction coupling (ECC). These include L‐type Ca2+ channels (LTCCs) and their constitutive inhibitor Rad, 12 ryanodine receptors (RyR2) of the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR), phospholamban [PLB, a constitutive inhibitor of the SR Ca2+ pump (SERCA2a)], Troponin I (TnI) and cardiac myosin‐binding protein C (MyBP‐C). 13 Activation of the main actors of the ECC enhances Ca2+ cycling and consequently increases heart rate (HR), contraction amplitude and relaxation. 14 Along with PKA, Ca2+/Calmodulin‐dependent kinase II (CaMKII) contributes to β‐AR regulation of cardiac function 15 , 16 ; LTCCs, RyR2, MyBP‐C and PLB are also substrates for CaMKII.
Emerging evidence supports a relevant role for Epac, a guanine nucleotide‐exchange factor for the small GTPases Rap1 and Rap2, 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 as a mediator of cAMP signalling in the heart and a regulator of Ca2+ signalling/contractility. 21 Two cardiac Epac isoforms have been identified. Epac1 is the major neonatal isoform whereas Epac2 expression is predominant in adults. 22 Upon cAMP binding, Epac enhances the phosphorylation of several Ca2+ handling proteins including RyR2 and PLB, thereby facilitating Ca2+ release from SR and reuptake. Epac also increases cardiac myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity through phosphorylation of TnI and MyBP‐C. 23 These effects have been attributed to the activation of Epac/Rap/Phospholipase C (PLC)/protein kinase C (PKC)/ CaMKII‐mediated signalling. 21 , 24 , 25
Diabetes mellitus (DM) represents a major global health problem 26 and contributes to the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), which finally culminates in heart failure (HF) 27 , 28 in the absence of hypertension and structural heart diseases. DCM is characterized by cardiac remodelling, myocardial fibrosis, diastolic and systolic dysfunction. 29 The underlying pathophysiology of the prolonged process that culminates in DCM and HF is complex. However, it is well accepted that cardiac dysfunction and HF caused by DM are associated with metabolic abnormalities, sympathetic nervous system (SNS) overactivity and Ca2+ mishandling. 30 , 31 Nevertheless, contrasted results were obtained regarding altered β‐AR‐mediated response and PKA signalling in various animal models of DM. 32 , 33 Moreover, there is little information concerning Epac modification in DCM despite its established role in mediating pro‐hypertrophic effects of β‐AR stimulation. 34 Although disturbances in Ca2+ signalling and CaMKII have been investigated in DCM, 30 , 35 , 36 data on actual changes affecting the expression and activity of the proteins involved in Ca2+ homeostasis during the evolution of DCM are controversial. 30 , 31 , 33
In a recent study, we characterized the evolution of cardiac structure and function in a rat model of DCM at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after streptozotocin (STZ)–induced type 1 diabetes (T1D). 37 We showed that sustained hyperglycaemia in diabetic rats was associated with cardiac remodelling including steatosis and fibrosis as well as bradycardia and an early (4 weeks) increase in cardiac systolic function as evaluated by ejection fraction (EF) and fraction shortening (FS) of the left ventricle (LV). 37 This correlated with upregulation of β1‐ARs and total cAMP levels, whereas normalization of cardiac function and cAMP occurred at later time points and correlated with upregulation of some of the major cardiac PDEs. 37 However, whether these changes were associated with downstream modifications of cAMP effectors and Ca2+ handling proteins in DCM was not investigated. Thus, this study was designed to delineate the alterations affecting Epac1/2 isoforms and PKA (RI, RIIα and Cα subunits), as well as the expression of CaMKII and the major actors of the ECC process in the same rat model of STZ‐induced T1D. We show for the first time differential and time‐specific regulations in cardiac Epac1/2, PKA subunits, CaMKII, as well as the impact of these alterations on the phosphorylation status of PLB and TnI. These results may prove useful in proposing new therapeutic approaches in T1D‐induced DCM.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Animal model
All experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the Lebanese American University (LAU) and adhered to the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals published by the US National Research Council committee.
Eighty‐nine adult male Wistar rats were used in this study. T1D was induced at 5 weeks of age in rats weighing between 80–130 g as previously described. 37 Briefly, 12 h after fasting, animals received one intraperitoneal injection of streptozotocin (STZ, Sigma‐Aldrich: 65 mg/kg in 0.1 M citrate buffer, pH = 4.5). Age‐matched control rats (CON) were injected with vehicle (0.1 M citrate buffer, pH = 4.5) via the same route. After 72 h, fasting glucose levels were measured in blood droplets withdrawn from the tails of animals, using Accu‐Check® Performa glucometer (Roche). Eighty‐five per cent of the rats injected with STZ exhibited fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels >200 mg/dL in addition to polyuria and polydipsia and were considered diabetic. All experiments were performed at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after STZ or vehicle injection (Figure S1).
2.2. Anatomical study
Body weights (BW) were measured under anaesthesia, and the hearts were rapidly excised, rinsed with a fresh cold physiological saline solution, weighed and stored in liquid nitrogen for real‐time PCR for the genes of interest [Atrial natriuretic factor (ANF), Epac1/2, SERCA2a, PLB and TnI] and western blot analysis for Epac2, the main PKA subunits (RI, RIIα and the Cα subunit), CaMKII, SERCA2a, p‐TnI (Ser23/24), total TnI, p‐PLB (Ser16), p‐PLB (Thr17) and total PLB. Lungs, liver and kidneys were also removed from all animals and weighed.
2.3. Real‐time quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the frozen cardiac tissue of all control and diabetic rats using TRIZOL reagent (Ambion; life technologies). RNA (1 μg) was reverse‐transcribed to single‐stranded cDNA using iScript cDNA synthesis kit (Bio‐Rad) as per the manufacturer's instructions. Real‐time qPCR was performed with CFX96 Real‐Time PCR Detection System (Bio‐Rad) using SoAdvancedTM Universal SYBR® Green Supermix (Bio‐Rad) and performed on CFX96 RT‐PCR Detection System (Bio‐Rad) in triplicate. Three independent technical replicates were run for each cardiac sample. The specificity of each primer set was monitored by analysing the dissociation curve. GAPDH was used as a housekeeping gene. Expression of the following genes was analysed: ANF, Epac1/2, SERCA2a, PLB and TnI. Table S1 shows the sequence of forward and reverse primers that were used. The relative expression level of each gene was determined using the comparative cycle threshold (Ct) method (2−∆∆Ct) normalized to control GAPDH gene.
2.4. Western blot
Frozen hearts from control and diabetic rats at 4, 8 and 12 weeks were homogenized in an ice‐cold buffer containing 150 mM NaCl, 20 mM Hepes (pH 7.4), 2 mM EDTA, 1 mM Phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride (Sigma‐Aldrich) and supplemented with 10% Glycerol, 0,2% Triton and Complete Protease Inhibitor Tablets from Roche Diagnostics. Protein lysates were kept on ice for 30 min and then centrifuged at 16560 g for 15 min at 4°C. The total protein concentration in the supernatant was determined using Nanodrop, and then 20 μg of protein extracts was loaded onto sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels for separation and transferred to polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (Bio‐Rad). Membranes were blocked with bovine serum albumin for 1 h at room temperature and then probed with different primary antibodies at 4°C overnight. Epac2 was detected using a rabbit polyclonal anti‐Epac2 antibody (1:1000; Proteintech 19,103‐1‐AP). PKA subunits (RI, RIIα and Cα) were detected using mouse antibodies (1:500; BD Biosciences). CaMKII was detected with a rabbit anti‐CaMKII antibody (1:1000; Santa Cruz). SERCA2a was detected with a mouse anti‐SERCA2a (1:1000; Santa Cruz). Rabbit anti‐PLB (1:5000; Cell Signaling), rabbit anti‐phospho‐Ser16 PLB (1:5000; Badrilla), rabbit anti‐phospho‐Thr17 PLB (1:5000; Badrilla), rabbit anti‐TnI (1:1000; Cell Signaling) and rabbit anti‐phospho‐Ser23/24 TnI (1:1000; Cell Signaling) antibodies were used to detect total PLB, phospho‐Ser16 PLB [p‐PLB (Ser16)], phospho‐Thr17 PLB [p‐PLB (Thr17)], total TnI and phospho‐Ser23/24 TnI [p‐TnI (Ser23/24)], respectively. Protein loading was monitored using a rabbit anti‐actin (1:1000; Abcam) and a rabbit anti‐calsequestrin (1:2000; Thermo Scientific) antibodies. The membranes were then probed with horseradish peroxidase‐conjugated secondary antibodies: goat pAb to rabbit (Abcam, ab6721) or to mouse (Abcam, ab97040), and the bands were visualized by enhanced chemiluminescence (Clarity Western ECL substrate; Bio‐Rad, 170–5061). Immunoreactive bands were revealed in ChemiDoc Imaging Systems (Bio‐Rad), and densitometric analysis with ImageJ software was used for quantification. For Epac2, PKA subunits (RI, RIIα and Cα), CaMKII, SERCA2a, total TnI and total PLB, each sample was normalized to the loading control (calsequestrin and/or actin): R1 = protein expression/loading control ratio. For p‐TnI (Ser23/24), p‐PLB (Ser16), p‐PLB (Thr17), R2 [phosphorylated protein/loading control ratio] was first quantified for each sample and then normalized to its corresponding total protein/loading control ratio: R2/R1.
2.5. Statistical analysis
All quantitative data are presented as mean ± SEM and analysed by Prism (version 8.0). A two‐way anova was performed in order to study the effect of STZ treatment, time and their interaction on the different outcomes. When the interaction was significant, two‐way anova was followed by post hoc Tukey's multiple comparison test. Significance was set to p < 0.05.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Induction and characterization of DCM in adult rats
In order to delineate the alterations affecting cAMP effectors and the major actors of the cardiac ECC, we used a T1D‐induced DCM model, which we characterized in detail in a previous study. 37 T1D was induced by STZ injection in 5‐week‐old rats (Figure S1), and glycaemia was measured in both vehicle‐treated (CON) and STZ‐treated (STZ) rats at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after injection. FBG levels were increased by ~4.4‐fold in STZ‐treated rats compared with their age‐matched CON (Figure 1A). Anatomical data of control and diabetic rats monitored at 4, 8 and 12 weeks following injection indicate that all STZ‐treated rats had a significantly lower BW (Figure 1B) as well as lungs, liver and kidneys weights compared with their age‐matched CON (Table 1). Moreover, a significant decrease in the heart weight (HW) by ~50% was noted in all STZ‐treated rats compared with their age‐matched CON (Figure 1C and Table 1) along with increases in the expression of ANF (Figure 1D), a biomarker gene for DCM. These data attest a structural remodelling in the diabetic hearts.
TABLE 1.
Week 4 | Week 8 | Week 12 | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CON (n = 14) | STZ (n = 15) | CON (n = 13) | STZ (n = 14) | CON (n = 14) | STZ (n = 19) | |
BW (g) | 284 ± 6 | 100 ± 8*** | 358 ± 9^^^ | 135 ± 9*** | 367 ± 13&&& | 140 ± 7***;& |
HW (g) | 0.88 ± 0.03 | 0.40 ± 0.03 | 1.04 ± 0.04 | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 1.06 ± 0.04 | 0.57 ± 0.02 |
HW/BW (mg/g) | 3.1 ± 0.1 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.1 | 2.9 ± 0.1 | 4.2 ± 0.2 |
Lungs (g) | 1.52 ± 0.06 | 0.76 ± 0.04 | 1.56 ± 0.06 | 1.02 ± 0.06 | 1.84 ± 0.10 | 1.09 ± 0.05 |
Lungs/BW (mg/g) | 5.34 ± 0.16 | 7.91 ± 0.42 | 4.36 ± 0.16 | 7.79 ± 0.47 | 5.06 ± 0.26 | 8.15 ± 0.58 |
Kidneys (g) | 1.96 ± 0.06 | 1.31 ± 0.09 | 2.43 ± 0.09 | 1.74 ± 0.09 | 2.32 ± 0.09 | 1.81 ± 0.07 |
Kidney/BW (mg/g) | 6.89 ± 0.14 | 13.29 ± 0.34 | 6.77 ± 0.17 | 13.07 ± 0.28 | 6.34 ± 0.15 | 13.43 ± 0.78 |
Liver (g) | 9.98 ± 0.61 | 4.47 ± 0.33 | 11.17 ± 0.66 | 6.62 ± 0.46 | 11.19 ± 0.45 | 7.11 ± 0.33 |
Liver/BW (mg/g) | 35.05 ± 1.99 | 45.52 ± 1.91* | 31.02 ± 1.21 | 49.57 ± 2.05*** | 30.77 ± 1.22 | 52.54 ± 3.29*** |
Note: All data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. A two‐way anova test was performed to study the effect of STZ treatment, time and their interaction on the different outcomes. The interaction was only significant for the BW and Liver/BW; hence, two‐way anova was followed by post hoc Tukey's multiple comparison test. Statistically significant differences between CON and STZ rats of the same age are indicated as *, p < 0.05; ***, p < 0.001. Statistically significant differences between CON‐4 weeks and CON‐8 weeks are indicated as ^^^, p < 0.001. Statistically significant differences between CON‐4 weeks and CON‐12 weeks or between STZ‐4 weeks and STZ‐12 weeks are indicated as &, p < 0.05; &&&, p < 0.001. Two‐way anova showed no significant interaction between STZ treatment and time for the HW, HW/BW, Lungs, Lungs/BW, Kidneys, Kidneys/BW and liver, while the effect of STZ treatment alone had the same statistically significant effect on all these outcomes (p < 0.0001) across time.
Abbreviations: BW, body weight; HW, heart weight.
3.2. Expression of Epac1/2 isoforms in control and diabetic hearts
To determine whether DCM impacts cAMP downstream signalling, we first measured mRNA expression of Epac1 and Epac2 in hearts from control and diabetic rats at 4, 8 and 12 weeks following either vehicle or STZ injection. Each cardiac sample was then normalized to GAPDH levels, which were similar between STZ‐treated rats and their age‐matched CON (Figure S2). Statistical analysis showed no significant interaction between STZ treatment and the time on the mRNA expression of Epac1; however, STZ treatment induced significant increases in its expression, similarly across time (p < 0.001; Figure 2A). In contrast, the upregulation in Epac2 transcripts by ~2‐fold was not apparent in STZ‐treated rats compared with their age‐matched CON until Week 12 (p < 0.05; Figure 2B). We then determined whether the strong increase in Epac2 mRNA observed in the diabetic hearts translates into similar changes in protein expression. Equal amounts of proteins prepared from heart extracts from CON or STZ rats were separated on SDS/PAGE, and Epac2 protein was detected by western blotting using Epac2 selective antibody. A single band migrating at approximately 110 kDa was detected in rat hearts for Epac2 (Figure 2C; Figure S3) and its expression did not change in diabetic rats compared with their age‐matched CON regardless of the disease stage (Figure 2D).
3.3. Expression of PKA subunits and CaMKII in control and diabetic hearts
We then examined whether the expression of PKA, another cAMP effector playing a pivotal role in the regulation of cardiac contraction, 13 is altered in DCM. Different PKA subunits were investigated in hearts from control and diabetic rats at 4, 8 and 12 weeks following either vehicle or STZ injection. We detected a single band migrating at approximately 49 kDa for PKA RI (Figure 3A; Figure S4), 51 kDa for PKA RIIα (Figure 3A; Figure S5) and 40 kDa for PKA Cα (Figure 3A; Figure S6), respectively, in both control and diabetic hearts.
CaMKII is another cardiac kinase exhibiting a key role in tuning ECC. 15 One band migrating at approximately 50 kDa was identified for CaMKII in rat hearts (Figure 3A; Figure S7).
Each cardiac sample was then normalized to calsequestrin and/or actin, since the expression of either protein was similar between STZ‐treated rats and their age‐matched CON (Figure 3A). As shown in Figure 3B,C,D, no statistical difference was observed in the cardiac expression of PKA RI, PKA RIIα and PKA Cα between control and diabetic rats, regardless of the disease stage. In contrast, CaMKII expression was strongly increased in diabetic hearts at 12 weeks compared with their age‐matched controls (p < 0.001; Figure 3E).
3.4. Expression of the major actors of cardiac ECC in hearts from control and diabetic rats
In a next series of experiments, we examined the variations in the mRNA expression of the major actors of the cardiac ECC (SERCA2a, PLB and TnI) in hearts from control and diabetic rats at 4, 8 and 12 weeks. Each cardiac sample was then normalized to GAPDH levels which were similar between STZ‐treated rats and their age‐matched CON (Figure S2). Statistical analysis showed no significant interaction between STZ treatment and the time on the mRNA expression of SERCA2a, PLB and TnI (Figure 4). However, STZ treatment induced a significant increase in PLB mRNA expression similarly across time (p < 0.05) whereas SERCA2a and TnI mRNA expression did not change in diabetic compared with control rats regardless of the disease stage.
We next determined whether the mRNA expression pattern of SERCA2a, PLB and TnI in DCM (Figure 4) translates into a similar protein expression profile. A single band migrating at approximately 24 kDa for total TnI (Figure 5A; Figure S9), 7 kDa for total PLB (Figur 5A; Figure S12) and 100 kDa for SERCA2a (Figure 5A; Figure S13) was detected in both control and diabetic hearts. Expression of total TnI, PLB and SERCA2a was similar in CON and STZ‐treated rats at 4, 8 and 12 weeks (Figure 5A–C,F,G).
In healthy myocardium, PLB is phosphorylated at Ser16 by PKA and at Thr17 by CaMKII. 38 , 39 Phosphorylation of TnI by PKA and PKC occurs at both Ser23 and Ser24 and leads to the depression of myofilament Ca2+ sensitivity. 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 We tested whether these phosphorylation events were altered in the diabetic myocardium. Proteins were extracted from hearts of CON and STZ‐treated rats at 4, 8 and 12 weeks, and the expression of p‐TnI (Ser23/24), p‐PLB (Ser16) and p‐PLB (Thr17) was determined by western blotting as shown in Figure 5A. No significant differences were noted in the p‐TnI (Ser23/24)/Total TnI and p‐PLB (Ser16)/Total PLB ratios (Figure 5B–D; Figures S8 and S10) between control and diabetic rats regardless of the disease stage. Interestingly, the phosphorylation of PLB (Thr17) normalized to total PLB was increased by diabetes across time (p < 0.01; Figures 5E; Figure S11).
4. DISCUSSION
The major goal of the present study was to determine whether the differential and time‐specific changes that we have previously reported in cardiac β‐AR/cAMP/PDEs signalling 37 are associated with modifications of the downstream components of cAMP pathway and in the main players of cardiac ECC in a T1D‐induced DCM model. Our results show that T1D induces time and isoform‐specific modifications in the expression of cAMP effectors, particularly Epac, CaMKII and the major Ca2+ handling proteins. Indeed, an early increase in Epac1 transcripts was noted in diabetic hearts at week 4, followed by increases in Epac2 mRNA at Week 12. However, Epac2 protein levels were unchanged. Expression of PKA subunits (RI, RIIα and Cα) remained unchanged with the progression of DCM, whereas CaMKII increased at Week 12. Changes in the various Ca2+ handling proteins involved a specific regulation at both the transcriptional and translational levels as the disease progressed. Indeed, PLB transcripts, but not protein levels, were upregulated in diabetic hearts with no changes observed in SERCA2a and TnI gene expression irrespective of the disease evolution. Moreover, PLB phosphorylation at threonine‐17 was increased in DCM, whereas phosphorylation of both PLB at serine‐16 and TnI at serine‐23/24 remained unchanged.
The STZ‐induced T1D model used in the present study was recently characterized in detail. Consistent with our previous findings, 37 sustained hyperglycaemia measured in STZ‐injected rats was associated with decreases in HW by ~50% and increases in both HW indexed to BW (~ +38%) and ANF expression, a cardiac remodelling marker of the foetal gene programme. Although not repeated in the present series, our previous data showed that STZ‐treated rats exhibited other known structural hallmarks of the diabetic heart as early as the 4th week, including a reduction of mean cardiac myocyte width and the emergence of cardiac steatosis, whereas we noted a relatively late onset of cardiac fibrosis on the 12th week following STZ injection (Figure 6). Furthermore, echocardiography pointed to the development of DCM‐associated cardiac remodelling, namely decreases in LV posterior and septal wall thicknesses, LV end‐systolic and end‐diastolic diameters, as well as a decrease in heart rate (HR) and LV volumes during the cardiac cycle at 4, 8 and 12 weeks after STZ injection. Both EF and FS were first increased in STZ‐treated rats at 4 weeks in line with concomitant upregulation of β1‐AR receptors and cAMP levels. 37 However, as the disease progressed, cardiac function along with β1‐AR transcripts and total basal cAMP levels were normalized, whereas PDE3A protein expression increased at Week 8. 37 Thus, in the present study, we assessed whether these changes affect cAMP effectors, particularly Epac1/2 and PKA. Our results show an increase in Epac1 mRNA expression in diabetic hearts at Week 4, which coincided with increases in β1‐AR/cAMP in the same rat model. However, Epac1 upregulation is maintained until Week 12 when elevation in Epac2 mRNA expression also emerges. Interestingly, alterations in Epac2 mRNA seen in diabetic rats were not reflected in similar changes of the protein expression regardless of the disease stage. In the myocardium from both control and diabetic adult rats, Epac1 protein expression was not detected with the antibody tested in this study. This could be related to developmental changes in gene expression of Epac isoforms, as some studies reported that Epac2, relative to Epac1, becomes dominant in the adult compared with foetal heart. 22 Although the mechanisms were not explored, our results suggest that the genes encoding for Epac1 and Epac2 are subjected to time‐specific and differential regulation of their transcription and translation. Furthermore, one cannot exclude the fact that the twelve‐week timeline followed in this study to assess the molecular changes underlying the progression of DCM lies most probably within the pathophysiological window that precedes any alterations occurring in Epac2 protein levels. Moreover, potential specific changes in the expression of Epac1/2 proteins may occur in subcellular cardiac compartments that would require more precise investigations. 47 , 48 Indeed, Epac1 was shown previously to mediate the pro‐hypertrophic effects of β‐AR stimulation 49 through either its recruitment to β1‐ARs via β‐arrestin2 47 or its association with PDE4D3, RyR2, calcineurin and the extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 5 (ERK5) in a mAKAP (muscle A kinase‐anchoring protein)‐coordinated signal transduction complex at the nuclear envelope. 50 Moreover, Epac2 has been suggested to induce SR Ca2+ leak and arrhythmia, an effect that seems to be mediated by β1‐AR pathway. 51 Taken together, these alterations might participate in the progression of DCM. Interestingly, expression of PKA RI, PKA RIIα and PKA Cα was unchanged in DCM regardless of the disease stage, attesting differential regulation of PKA and Epac expression in DCM and hence distinctive implications of these two effectors in cAMP signalling in cardiac diseases. Our results on PKA subunits are consistent with previous studies that showed similar protein content of PKA RI, RII and C subunits despite a decrease in PKA activity in the heart of mice at 16 weeks after induction of T1D. 32 However, when investigating specific changes affecting the C subunit of PKA in different cellular compartments, the protein levels were decreased in the cytosolic and myofilaments/nuclear fractions. 32 This compartment‐specific loss of PKA, which was reflected by reduced phosphorylation of discrete substrates and was attributed to contractile impairment, points at the potential remodelling of cAMP/PKA pools in the diabetic myocardium. Although we did not measure PKA activity in this study, the unchanged PKA‐dependent phosphorylation of PLB and TnI that we report herein could speak for a preserved PKA activity in diabetic hearts at least in the vicinity of these two targets. Indeed, similar basal PKA activity was reported in the heart of rats at 6 weeks after induction of T1D. 52 Nevertheless, controversial findings were also reported concerning both basal and stimulated cardiac PKA activity in STZ‐induced T1D, which might be due to species differences and the duration of diabetes. 33 , 53
CaMKII, a critical transducer of Ca2+ signalling, is a multifunctional protein kinase that phosphorylates a wide range of substrates and regulates numerous cellular functions, including ECC. 35 , 54 CaMKII has been proposed as a key contributor to the deleterious effects of chronic β‐AR activation in DCM, primarily by exacerbating RyR2‐mediated diastolic Ca2+ leak. 55 , 56 Therefore, we determined whether the expression of CaMKII is altered in the diabetic myocardium during the progression of DCM. A single immunoreactive band migrating at ~50 kDa was detected in rat hearts for CaMKII. CaMKII δ isoform is the predominant isoform in the heart, including in human myocardium whereas the ɣ subunit is only expressed at low levels in cardiomyocytes. 54 Interestingly, 12 weeks after STZ injection, DCM was associated with increases in CaMKII protein levels and CaMKII‐dependent phosphorylation of PLB. The rate of PLB phosphorylation may be the result of a balance between an upregulation in the kinase activity, which has been reported in DCM through phosphorylation, oxidation and O‐GlcNAcylation in diabetic hearts from rodents and human patients 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 and changes in phosphatases activity. 61 , 62
In DM, the process of cardiac Ca2+ cycling is modified in both humans and animal models, contributing to impaired cardiac contraction and relaxation. 30 We characterized herein the changes affecting some of the main actors of ECC/ Ca2+ proteins handling, SERCA2a, PLB and TnI. SERCA2a mediates SR Ca2+ reuptake and therefore is a key determinant of both cardiac relaxation and contraction. Its activity is dependent on its interaction with PLB, which binds and inhibits the Ca2+ pump. However, phosphorylation of PLB relieves this inhibition and induces a substantial increase in Ca2+ flux via SERCA2a. Previous studies in diabetic animals have reported a reduction in the protein and/or the activity of SERCA2a, causing a decrease in the Ca2+ reuptake rate and SR Ca2+ load, hence contributing to cardiac dysfunction. 30 , 63 Moreover, PLB levels were reported to be higher in DCM 64 whereas expression of p‐PLB was decreased. 63 , 65 In the present study, we report similar transcripts and protein levels of SERCA2a in controls and diabetic hearts at 4, 8 and 12 weeks following either STZ or vehicle injection. Protein expression of PLB was unchanged despite an increase in PLB mRNA levels at the three time points. Furthermore, SERCA2a‐to‐PLB ratio was also similar in control and diabetic myocardium (data not shown). Importantly, a higher basal phosphorylation rate of PLB by CaMKII, but not PKA, was detected at Week 12. One would still argue that differences in p‐PLB at serine‐16 can be unmasked upon ß‐AR stimulation, a possibility that we perfectly acknowledge. However, in light of the reported data herein, one would think that the steady‐state hyperphosphorylation of PLB leads to an upregulation of SERCA2a activity and a consequent improved Ca2+ transportation. These results are at variance with observations that Ca2+ reuptake into the SR was impaired in 7‐week diabetic rats, although the expression of SERCA2a, PLB and p‐PLB remained intact. 53 The molecular mechanisms underlying the decrease in SERCA2a activity are not completely clear, when no changes in PLB expression or phosphorylation are found. Yet, several studies reported multiple possible mechanisms causing the reduction in SERCA2a activity in DCM. For instance, impairment of relaxation observed in DCM was shown to be associated with a decrease in the activity of SERCA2a due either to the direct damage of its ATP‐binding site by oxygen‐derived free radicals 66 , 67 or to its downregulation through posttranslational modifications, including glycation, carbonylation and O‐GlcNAcylation. 31 , 68 Taken together, these findings imply that hyperglycaemia leads to delayed Ca2+ uptake into the SR, thus affecting the normal processes of cardiomyocyte relaxation‐contractility; whereas SERCA2a expression/activity, and the expression/phosphorylation its primary regulator PLB, may remain normal or even stronger to compensate for this abnormality. It is worth noting that although we did not measure Ca2+ transients, a limitation of our study, the modifications in PLB phosphorylation by CaMKII but not PKA in the diabetic myocardium suggest that specific subcellular cAMP/PKA and Ca2+/CaMKII pools might be preferentially impacted in DCM and would require further characterization.
Abnormalities in the contractile and regulatory proteins could be responsible for the mechanical defects in DCM. However, there have been diverging findings regarding the sensitivity of the myofilament to Ca2+ in DCM. 69 , 70 , 71 Phosphorylation of cardiac TnI is associated with altered Ca2+‐force relationship in isolated muscle preparations. Therefore, we investigated whether DM affects TnI expression and phosphorylation rate. Our results show similar expression of TnI at the protein level and phosphorylation at PKA sites in control and diabetic hearts. These findings are aligned with previous data published by our group, showing that STZ‐treated rats exhibit normal EF and FS as well as unchanged basal cAMP levels at 8, and 12 weeks following diabetes induction 37 (Figure 6).
To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that delineates the intricate regulations of cAMP effectors and the major actors of ECC in the myocardium during the pathophysiological progression of T1D‐induced DCM. These novel results are to be considered with respect to the previously documented changes affecting β‐AR/cAMP/PDEs signalling in the same animal model 37 although they present some limitations. Importantly, the differential and time‐specific changes in cardiac Epac1/2, PKA subunits, CaMKII and the phosphorylation status of PLB and TnI in diabetic myocardium that we delineate herein at the level of the whole heart, suggest potential modifications in the regulation of specific subcellular cAMP and Ca2+ pools, which would require further characterization for a better understanding of how cAMP and Ca2+ compartmentalization is remodelled in DCM. Moreover, more subtle and specific changes in the phosphorylation status of some ECC actors may be unmasked upon ß‐AR stimulation with respect to basal conditions. One should note as well the potential confounding effects when assessing gene and protein expression in the whole heart versus cardiac myocytes. Indeed, the heart is comprised of a syncytium of cardiac myocytes and surrounding nonmyocytes, the majority of which are cardiac fibroblasts. In response to stress, cardiac myocytes become hypertrophic and can change their electrical properties, whereas fibroblasts convert into ‘activated’ myofibroblasts, proliferate and enhance ECM deposition, which leads to cardiac fibrosis. 72 The latter affects cardiac myocyte metabolism and performance and ultimately ventricular function. 73 We have previously documented the emergence of fibrosis in the diabetic myocardium 12 weeks following STZ injection. 37 Accumulating evidence now suggests that downstream cAMP effectors such as PKA and Epac as well as Ca2+ signalling including CaMKII modulate a variety of fundamental cellular processes involved in fibroblasts and fibrosis‐associated cardiac diseases. 74 , 75 , 76
5. CONCLUSION
In light of the novel data we provide herein, we conclude that abnormalities affecting cAMP effectors, CaMKII and Ca2+ proteins handling in DCM are complex and involve differential and time‐specific regulations. Our results suggest that more subtle and fine functional changes may occur in specific compartments within the cell. Thus, a fine characterization of these specific defects affecting both cardiac cAMP and Ca2+ signalling is crucial for a better understanding of the pathophysiology of DCM, its progression and management through the identification of new therapeutic targets.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
Victoria Chaoul: Conceptualization (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); visualization (equal); writing – original draft (equal). Rita Hanna: Conceptualization (equal); formal analysis (equal); investigation (equal); methodology (equal); visualization (equal). Pia Hachem: Investigation (equal). Magali Samia El Hayek: Investigation (equal). Wared Nour‐Eldine: Investigation (equal). Pamela Abou‐Khalil: Investigation (equal). Elias Abi‐Ramia: Investigation (equal). Grégoire Vandecasteele: Conceptualization (supporting); funding acquisition (supporting); resources (supporting); writing – review and editing (supporting). Aniella Abi‐Gerges: Conceptualization (lead); data curation (lead); funding acquisition (lead); methodology (lead); project administration (lead); resources (lead); supervision (lead); validation (lead); writing – original draft (lead); writing – review and editing (lead).
CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest. Magali Samia EL HAYEK is currently an employee of Eli Lilly and Company.
Supporting information
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This study was jointly funded with the support of the National Council for Scientific Research (CNRS‐L) in Lebanon and the Lebanese American University, CNRS‐L/LAU N° 858 and SRRC‐R‐2021‐289 to A.A.G as well as the French and Lebanese governments, PHC CEDRE N° 42338SA to A.A.G and G.V. This work was also funded by grants from Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR‐19‐CE14‐0038‐02 and ANR‐21‐CE14‐0082‐01 to GV). WN‐E was supported by the postdoctoral fellowship programme and interdisciplinary research clusters initiated by the Lebanese American University (LAU), through the office of the Graduate Studies and Research office (GSR). MSEH was supported by a PhD fellowship from the French Ministère de lʼEnseignement Supérieur, de la Recherche et de lʼInnovation. We thank Ms. Audrey Varin and Mr. Jean Karam for their skilful technical assistance.
Chaoul V, Hanna R, Hachem P, et al. Differential changes in cyclic adenosine 3′‐5′ monophosphate (cAMP) effectors and major Ca2+ handling proteins during diabetic cardiomyopathy. J Cell Mol Med. 2023;27:1277‐1289. doi: 10.1111/jcmm.17733
Victoria Chaoul and Rita Hanna contributed equally to the work.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data are available upon request.
REFERENCES
- 1. Bobin P, Belacel‐Ouari M, Bedioune I, et al. Cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterases in heart and vessels: a therapeutic perspective. Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2016;109(6–7):431‐443. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2016.02.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2. Walsh DA, Perkins JP, Krebs EG. An adenosine 3′,5′‐monophosphate‐dependant protein kinase from rabbit skeletal muscle. J Biol Chem. 1968;243(13):3763‐3765. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Corbin JD, Keely SL. Characterization and regulation of heart adenosine 3′:5′‐monophosphate‐dependent protein kinase isozymes. J Biol Chem. 1977;252(3):910‐918. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Sowadski JM, Xuong N, Anderson D, Taylor SS. Crystallization studies of cAMP‐dependent protein kinase. Crystals of catalytic subunit diffract to 3.5 a resolution. J Mol Biol. 1985;182(4):617‐620. doi: 10.1016/0022-2836(85)90249-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Diskar M, Zenn HM, Kaupisch A, et al. Regulation of cAMP‐dependent protein kinases: the human protein kinase X (PrKX) reveals the role of the catalytic subunit alphaH‐alphaI loop. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(46):35910‐35918. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.155150 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Uhler MD, Chrivia JC, McKnight GS. Evidence for a second isoform of the catalytic subunit of cAMP‐dependent protein kinase. J Biol Chem. 1986;261(33):15360‐15363. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(18)66717-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Reimann EM, Walsh DA, Krebs EG. Purification and properties of rabbit skeletal muscle adenosine 3′,5′‐monophosphate‐dependent protein kinases. J Biol Chem. 1971;246(7):1986‐1995. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)77178-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Corbin JD, Keely SL, Park CR. The distribution and dissociation of cyclic adenosine 3′:5′‐monophosphate‐dependent protein kinases in adipose, cardiac, and other tissues. J Biol Chem. 1975;250(1):218‐225. doi: 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)42003-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9. Pidoux G, Taskén K. Specificity and spatial dynamics of protein kinase a signaling organized by A‐kinase‐anchoring proteins. J Mol Endocrinol. 2010;44(5):271‐284. doi: 10.1677/JME-10-0010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10. Taylor SS, Kim C, Vigil D, et al. Dynamics of signaling by PKA. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2005;1754(1–2):25‐37. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.08.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11. Taylor SS, Zhang P, Steichen JM, Keshwani MM, Kornev AP. PKA: lessons learned after twenty years. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1834(7):1271‐1278. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2013.03.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12. Liu G, Papa A, Katchman AN, et al. Mechanism of adrenergic Ca(V)1.2 stimulation revealed by proximity proteomics. Nature. 2020;577(7792):695‐700. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-1947-z [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13. Bers DM. Cardiac excitation–contraction coupling. Nature. 2002;415(6868):198‐205. doi: 10.1038/415198a [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14. Movsesian MA. Beta‐adrenergic receptor agonists and cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase inhibitors: shifting the focus from inotropy to cyclic adenosine monophosphate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34(2):318‐324. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00220-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15. Grimm M, Brown JH. Beta‐adrenergic receptor signaling in the heart: role of CaMKII. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2010;48(2):322‐330. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2009.10.016 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Tong CW, Gaffin RD, Zawieja DC, Muthuchamy M. Roles of phosphorylation of myosin binding protein‐C and troponin I in mouse cardiac muscle twitch dynamics. J Physiol. 2004;558(Pt 3):927‐941. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2004.062539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Bos JL. Epac: a new cAMP target and new avenues in cAMP research. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2003;4(9):733‐738. doi: 10.1038/nrm1197 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18. de Rooij J, Rehmann H, van Triest M, Cool RH, Wittinghofer A, Bos JL. Mechanism of regulation of the Epac family of cAMP‐dependent RapGEFs. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(27):20829‐20836. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M001113200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. de Rooij J, Zwartkruis FJT, Verheijen MHG, et al. Epac is a Rap1 guanine‐nucleotide‐exchange factor directly activated by cyclic AMP. Nature. 1998;396(6710):474‐477. doi: 10.1038/24884 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20. Kawasaki H, Springett GM, Mochizuki N, et al. A family of cAMP‐binding proteins that directly activate Rap1. Science. 1998;282(5397):2275‐2279. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5397.2275 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Ruiz‐Hurtado G, Morel E, Domínguez‐Rodríguez A, et al. Epac in cardiac calcium signaling. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2013;58:162‐171. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2012.11.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Ulucan C, Wang X, Baljinnyam E, et al. Developmental changes in gene expression of Epac and its upregulation in myocardial hypertrophy. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2007;293(3):H1662‐H1672. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00159.2007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Cazorla O, Lucas A, Poirier F, Lacampagne A, Lezoualc'h F. The cAMP binding protein Epac regulates cardiac myofilament function. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(33):14144‐14149. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0812536106 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Oestreich EA, Malik S, Goonasekera SA, et al. Epac and phospholipase Cepsilon regulate Ca2+ release in the heart by activation of protein kinase Cepsilon and calcium‐calmodulin kinase II. J Biol Chem. 2009;284(3):1514‐1522. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M806994200 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25. Oestreich EA, Wang H, Malik S, et al. Epac‐mediated activation of phospholipase C(epsilon) plays a critical role in beta‐adrenergic receptor‐dependent enhancement of Ca2+ mobilization in cardiac myocytes. J Biol Chem. 2007;282(8):5488‐5495. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M608495200 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26. Karaoui LR, Deeb ME, Nasser L, Hallit S. Knowledge and practice of patients with diabetes mellitus in Lebanon: a cross‐sectional study. BMC Public Health. 2018;18(1):525. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5416-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27. Gleissner CA, Galkina E, Nadler JL, Ley K. Mechanisms by which diabetes increases cardiovascular disease. Drug Discov Today Dis Mech. 2007;4(3):131‐140. doi: 10.1016/j.ddmec.2007.12.005 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28. Kannel WB, Hjortland M, Castelli WP. Role of diabetes in congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. Am J Cardiol. 1974;34(1):29‐34. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(74)90089-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29. Jia G, Hill MA, Sowers JR. Diabetic cardiomyopathy: an update of mechanisms contributing to this clinical entity. Circ Res. 2018;122(4):624‐638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30. Al Kury LT. Calcium homeostasis in ventricular myocytes of diabetic cardiomyopathy. J Diabetes Res. 2020;2020:1942086. doi: 10.1155/2020/1942086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31. Jaquenod De Giusti C, Palomeque J, Mattiazzi A. Ca2+ mishandling and mitochondrial dysfunction: a converging road to prediabetic and diabetic cardiomyopathy. Pflugers Arch. 2022;474(1):33‐61. doi: 10.1007/s00424-021-02650-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32. Bockus LB, Humphries KM. cAMP‐dependent protein kinase (PKA) signaling is impaired in the diabetic heart. J Biol Chem. 2015;290(49):29250‐29258. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M115.681767 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33. Erdogan BR, Michel MC, Arioglu‐Inan E. Expression and signaling of β‐adrenoceptor subtypes in the diabetic heart. Cell. 2020;9(12):2548. doi: 10.3390/cells9122548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34. Morel E, Marcantoni A, Gastineau M, et al. cAMP‐binding protein Epac induces cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2005;97(12):1296‐1304. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.0000194325.31359.86 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35. Veitch CR, Power AS, Erickson JR. CaMKII inhibition is a novel therapeutic strategy to prevent diabetic cardiomyopathy. Front Pharmacol. 2021;12:695401. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.695401 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36. Erickson JR, Pereira L, Wang L, et al. Diabetic hyperglycaemia activates CaMKII and arrhythmias by O‐linked glycosylation. Nature. 2013;502(7471):372‐376. doi: 10.1038/nature12537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37. Hanna R, Nour‐Eldine W, Saliba Y, et al. Cardiac Phosphodiesterases are differentially increased in diabetic cardiomyopathy. Life Sci. 2021;283:119857. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.119857 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38. Frank KF et al. Sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+‐ATPase modulates cardiac contraction and relaxation. Cardiovasc Res. 2003;57(1):20‐27. doi: 10.1016/s0008-6363(02)00694-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39. Periasamy M, Kalyanasundaram A. SERCA pump isoforms: their role in calcium transport and disease. Muscle Nerve. 2007;35(4):430‐442. doi: 10.1002/mus.20745 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40. Kentish JC, McCloskey DT, Layland J, et al. Phosphorylation of troponin I by protein kinase a accelerates relaxation and crossbridge cycle kinetics in mouse ventricular muscle. Circ Res. 2001;88(10):1059‐1065. doi: 10.1161/hh1001.091640 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41. Noland TA Jr, Guo X, Raynor RL, et al. Cardiac troponin I mutants. Phosphorylation by protein kinases C and a and regulation of Ca(2+)‐stimulated MgATPase of reconstituted actomyosin S‐1. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(43):25445‐25454. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.43.25445 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42. Saeki Y, Shiozawa K, Yanagisawa K, Shibata T. Adrenaline increases the rate of cross‐bridge cycling in rat cardiac muscle. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1990;22(4):453‐460. doi: 10.1016/0022-2828(90)91480-u [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43. Strang KT, Sweitzer NK, Greaser ML, Moss RL. Beta‐adrenergic receptor stimulation increases unloaded shortening velocity of skinned single ventricular myocytes from rats. Circ Res. 1994;74(3):542‐549. doi: 10.1161/01.RES.74.3.542 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44. Turnbull L, Hoh JFY, Ludowyke RI, Rossmanith GH. Troponin I phosphorylation enhances crossbridge kinetics during beta‐adrenergic stimulation in rat cardiac tissue. J Physiol. 2002;542(Pt 3):911‐920. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2002.022707 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45. Wijnker PJ et al. Impact of site‐specific phosphorylation of protein kinase a sites Ser23 and Ser24 of cardiac troponin I in human cardiomyocytes. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2013;304(2):H260‐H268. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00498.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46. Zhang R, Zhao J, Potter JD. Phosphorylation of both serine residues in cardiac troponin I is required to decrease the Ca2+ affinity of cardiac troponin C. J Biol Chem. 1995;270(51):30773‐30780. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.51.30773 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47. Berthouze‐Duquesnes M, Lucas A, Saulière A, et al. Specific interactions between Epac1, β‐arrestin2 and PDE4D5 regulate β‐adrenergic receptor subtype differential effects on cardiac hypertrophic signaling. Cell Signal. 2013;25(4):970‐980. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306529 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48. Dodge‐Kafka KL, Soughayer J, Pare GC, et al. The protein kinase a anchoring protein mAKAP coordinates two integrated cAMP effector pathways. Nature. 2005;437(7058):574‐578. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2012.12.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49. Lezoualc'h F, Fazal L, Laudette M, Conte C. Cyclic AMP sensor EPAC proteins and their role in cardiovascular function and disease. Circ Res. 2016;118(5):88‐897. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.01.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50. Dodge‐Kafka KL, Kapiloff MS. The mAKAP signaling complex: integration of cAMP, calcium, and MAP kinase signaling pathways. Eur J Cell Biol. 2006;85(7):593‐602. doi: 10.1161/circulationaha.12.148619 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51. Pereira L, Cheng H, Lao DH, et al. Epac2 mediates cardiac β1‐adrenergic‐dependent sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+ leak and arrhythmia. Circulation. 2013;127(8):913‐922. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2008.07.042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52. Sharma V, Parsons H, Allard MF, McNeill JH. Metoprolol increases the expression of beta(3)‐adrenoceptors in the diabetic heart: effects on nitric oxide signaling and forkhead transcription factor‐3. Eur J Pharmacol. 2008;595(1–3):44‐51. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.91280.2008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53. Shao CH, Wehrens XH, Wyatt TA, et al. Exercise training during diabetes attenuates cardiac ryanodine receptor dysregulation. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2009;106(4):1280‐1292. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.04.026 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54. Zhang T, Brown JH. Role of Ca2+/calmodulin‐dependent protein kinase II in cardiac hypertrophy and heart failure. Cardiovasc Res. 2004;63(3):476‐486. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2004.04.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55. Erickson JR. Mechanisms of CaMKII activation in the heart. Front Pharmacol. 2014;5:59‐291. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2015.06.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56. Grimm M, Ling H, Willeford A, et al. CaMKIIδ mediates β‐adrenergic effects on RyR2 phosphorylation and SR Ca(2+) leak and the pathophysiological response to chronic β‐adrenergic stimulation. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 2015;85:282‐291. doi: 10.1186/s12933-018-0732-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57. Daniels LJ, Wallace RS, Nicholson OM, et al. Inhibition of calcium/calmodulin‐dependent kinase II restores contraction and relaxation in isolated cardiac muscle from type 2 diabetic rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2018;17(1):89. doi: 10.1038/nature12537 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58. Erickson JR, Pereira L, Wang L, et al. Diabetic hyperglycaemia activates CaMKII and arrhythmias by O‐linked glycosylation. Nature. 2013;502(7471):372‐376. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i4.338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59. Jiang SJ. Roles of transient receptor potential channel 6 in glucose‐induced cardiomyocyte injury. World J Diabetes. 2022;13(4):338‐357. doi: 10.1172/jci65268 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60. Luo M, Guan X, Luczak ED, et al. Diabetes increases mortality after myocardial infarction by oxidizing CaMKII. J Clin Invest. 2013;123(3):1262‐1274. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2019.06.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61. Guan Y, Zhou L, Zhang Y, Tian H, Li A, Han X. Effects of PP2A/Nrf2 on experimental diabetes mellitus‐related cardiomyopathy by regulation of autophagy and apoptosis through ROS dependent pathway. Cell Signal. 2019;62:109339. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.705424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62. Tayanloo‐Beik A, Roudsari PP, Rezaei‐Tavirani M, et al. Diabetes and heart failure: multi‐omics approaches. Front Physiol. 2021;12:705424. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-13-75 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63. Zhao SM, Wang YL, Guo CY, Chen JL, Wu YQ. Progressive decay of Ca2+ homeostasis in the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2014;13:75. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.2.463 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64. Bidasee KR, Zhang Y, Shao CH, et al. Diabetes increases formation of advanced glycation end products on Sarco(endo)plasmic reticulum Ca2+‐ATPase. Diabetes. 2004;53(2):463‐473. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0071014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65. Tuncay E, Okatan EN, Vassort G, Turan B. ß‐blocker timolol prevents arrhythmogenic Ca2+ release and normalizes Ca2+ and Zn2+ dyshomeostasis in hyperglycemic rat heart. PLoS One. 2013;8(7):e71014. doi: 10.1016/0003-9861(83)90020-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66. Okabe E, Hess ML, Oyama M, Ito H. Characterization of free radical‐mediated damage of canine cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum. Arch Biochem Biophys. 1983;225(1):164‐177. doi: 10.1161/01.res.80.1.76 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67. Xu KY, Zweier JL, Becker LC. Hydroxyl radical inhibits sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca(2+)‐ATPase function by direct attack on the ATP binding site. Circ Res. 1997;80(1):76‐81. doi: 10.1016/s0024-3205(01)01483-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68. Kim HW, Cho YS, Lee HR, Park SY, Kim YH. Diabetic alterations in cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+‐ATPase and phospholamban protein expression. Life Sci. 2001;70(4):367‐379. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2013.08.013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69. Chung CS, Mitov MI, Callahan LA, Campbell KS. Increased myocardial short‐range forces in a rodent model of diabetes reflect elevated content of β myosin heavy chain. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2014;552‐553:92‐99. doi: 10.1016/0925-4439(96)00007-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70. Liu X, Takeda N, Dhalla NS. Troponin I phosphorylation in heart homogenate from diabetic rat. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1996;1316(2):78‐84. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-123 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71. Zhang L, Ward ML, Phillips ARJ, et al. Protection of the heart by treatment with a divalent‐copper‐selective chelator reveals a novel mechanism underlying cardiomyopathy in diabetic rats. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2013;12:123. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-12-123 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72. Zhang P, Su J, Mende U. Cross talk between cardiac myocytes and fibroblasts: from multiscale investigative approaches to mechanisms and functional consequences. Am J Physiol‐Heart Circ Physiol. 2012;303(12):H1385‐H1396. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.01167.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73. Manabe I, Shindo T, Nagai R. Gene expression in fibroblasts and fibrosis: involvement in cardiac hypertrophy. Circ Res. 2002;91(12):1103‐1113. doi: 10.1161/01.res.0000046452.67724.b8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74. Delaunay M, Osman H, Kaiser S, Diviani D. The role of cyclic AMP signaling in cardiac fibrosis. Cell. 2020;9(1):69. doi: 10.3390/cells9010069 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75. Feng J, Armillei MK, Yu AS, Liang BT, Runnels LW, Yue L. Ca(2+) signaling in cardiac fibroblasts and fibrosis‐associated heart diseases. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2019;6(4):34. doi: 10.3390/jcdd6040034 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76. Martin TP, McCluskey C, Cunningham MR, Beattie J, Paul A, Currie S. CaMKIIδ interacts directly with IKKβ and modulates NF‐κB signalling in adult cardiac fibroblasts. Cell Signal. 2018;51:166‐175. doi: 10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.07.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Data are available upon request.