Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Apr 29.
Published in final edited form as: Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022 Nov 26;130(4):472–478. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2022.11.021

Table 2.

Number of Case and Control Patients, by History of Tick Exposure and Antibodies to Rickettsia rickettsii and Ehrlichia chaffeensis

Characteristic Case patients, n (%) Control patients, n (%) OR LCL UCL

Tick exposure
 Found a tick on body in past year (or year before symptom onset) 72 (88) 90 (47) 11.20 4.97 25.15
 Not found a tick on body in past year (or year before symptom onset) 7 (9) 98 (51) Ref
 Unsure about finding a tick on body in past year 3 (4) 3 (2)
Number of times ticks were found in past year
 10 or more 28 (39) 15(17) 4.20 1.91 9.24
 7–9 3 (4) 2 (2) 3.11 0.62 18.15
 4–6 16 (23) 16 (18) 2.25 0.97 5.21
 1–3 24 (34) 54 (62) Ref
Number of ticks found biting or stuck on body
 4 or more 34 (48) 8 (9) 33.05 9.92 155.12
 3 8 (11) 6 (7) 10.65 2.63 58.14
 2 10 (14) 20 (23) 4.17 1.19 17.89
 1 16 (23) 25 (29) 5.27 1.63 21.50
 0 3 (4) 28 (32) Ref
Tick bite reaction
 Bites from a tick created a mark or took longer than usual to heal 55 (67) 20 (11) 7.93 3.74 16.80
 Bites from a tick did not create a mark or take a long time to heal 17 (21) 49 (26) Ref
 Information about tick bite reaction not applicable or missing 10 (12) 122 (64)
Antibodies reactive to Rickettsia rickettsii and/or Ehrlichia chaffeensis
 Yes 14 (17) 18 (9) 2.00 0.90 4.20
 No 68 (83) 173 (91) Ref

Abbreviations: LCL, lower confidence limit; OR, odds ratio; Ref, reference; UCL, upper confidence limit.