Skip to main content
. 2023 Apr 8;35(5):1015–1025. doi: 10.1007/s40520-023-02391-1

Table 3.

Correlation analyses between betas (dual vs baseline) and clinical scores

All participants (N = 59)
Pearson correlation Spearman’s rho
TUG Gait speed Handgrip MMSE FAB Tinetti SPPB total Falls (N)
left PcG (– 52 0 42) – .12 .28* .06 – .03 .04 .08 .26* .13
left PcG (– 42 2 26) – .03 .09 .08 – .07 .00 .05 .19 .04
left SMA (– 4 4 52) – .17 .11 – .02 – .12 – .01 .05 .34** .16
right SMA (10 0 76) – .12 .06 .10 – .02 – .03 – .06 .41** .25
Dynapenic participants (N = 28)
Pearson correlation Spearman’s rho
TUG Gait speed Handgrip MMSE FAB Tinetti SPPB total Falls (N)
left PcG (– 52 0 42) – .44** .46** – .09 .29 – .13 .00 .39* – .06
left PcG (– 42 2 26) – .24 .11 – .06 .22 – .14 .03 .12 – .12
left SMA (– 4 4 52) .53** .20 – .16 .11 .12 – .01 .28 .00
right SMA (10 0 76) – .40* .07 – .08 .01 .08 – .03 .52** .19

** p < .01, one-tailed. * p < .05, one-tailed. Numbers printed in bold indicate significant results according to Bonferroni correction. Abbreviations: Precentral gyrus (PcG), supplementary motor area (SMA)